On 7/22/25 17:12, Kirill Shchetiniuk via Devel wrote:
> From: Kirill Shchetiniuk <kshch...@redhat.com>
>
> Refactored the virSecretLookupParseSecret fucntion to use the
> virXMLPropUUID fucntion, avoid getting the string and parsing it
> later. Previously two separate error states merged into one by using
> boolean NXOR operation.
>
> Signed-off-by: Kirill Shchetiniuk <kshch...@redhat.com>
> ---
> src/util/virsecret.c | 19 ++++++-------------
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/src/util/virsecret.c b/src/util/virsecret.c
> index 8a220a37ec..d85a563949 100644
> --- a/src/util/virsecret.c
> +++ b/src/util/virsecret.c
> @@ -64,34 +64,27 @@ int
> virSecretLookupParseSecret(xmlNodePtr secretnode,
> virSecretLookupTypeDef *def)
> {
> - g_autofree char *uuid = NULL;
> g_autofree char *usage = NULL;
> + int rc;
>
> - uuid = virXMLPropString(secretnode, "uuid");
> usage = virXMLPropString(secretnode, "usage");
> - if (uuid == NULL && usage == NULL) {
> - virReportError(VIR_ERR_XML_ERROR, "%s",
> - _("missing secret uuid or usage attribute"));
> +
> + if ((rc = virXMLPropUUID(secretnode, "uuid", VIR_XML_PROP_NONE,
> def->u.uuid)) < 0)
> return -1;
> - }
>
> - if (uuid && usage) {
> + if (!usage == (rc == 0)) {
This works, but it's horrible to read. Since we already ...
> virReportError(VIR_ERR_XML_ERROR, "%s",
> _("either secret uuid or usage expected"));
> return -1;
> }
>
> - if (uuid) {
> - if (virUUIDParse(uuid, def->u.uuid) < 0) {
> - virReportError(VIR_ERR_XML_ERROR,
> - _("invalid secret uuid '%1$s'"), uuid);
> - return -1;
> - }
> + if (rc > 0) {
have different branches when "uuid" attribute was present or not, might
as well put corresponding checks here.
> def->type = VIR_SECRET_LOOKUP_TYPE_UUID;
> } else {
> def->u.usage = g_steal_pointer(&usage);
> def->type = VIR_SECRET_LOOKUP_TYPE_USAGE;
> }
> +
> return 0;
> }
>
Michal
