From: Michal Privoznik <mpriv...@redhat.com>
In one instance, after virDomainDefGetSecurityLabelDef(SECURITY_DAC_NAME)
was called, we take the returned secdef and compare secdef->model against
SECURITY_DAC_NAME. This makes no sense because
virDomainDefGetSecurityLabelDef() has already done this comparison.
Signed-off-by: Michal Privoznik <mpriv...@redhat.com>
---
src/security/security_dac.c | 8 --------
1 file changed, 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/src/security/security_dac.c b/src/security/security_dac.c
index 2210117f12..8fb26168ca 100644
--- a/src/security/security_dac.c
+++ b/src/security/security_dac.c
@@ -2404,14 +2404,6 @@ virSecurityDACGenLabel(virSecurityManager *mgr,
return rc;
}
- if (seclabel->model
- && STRNEQ(seclabel->model, SECURITY_DAC_NAME)) {
- virReportError(VIR_ERR_INTERNAL_ERROR,
- _("security label model %1$s is not supported with
selinux"),
- seclabel->model);
- return rc;
- }
-
switch ((virDomainSeclabelType)seclabel->type) {
case VIR_DOMAIN_SECLABEL_STATIC:
if (seclabel->label == NULL) {
--
2.49.1
