On 1/27/26 11:19, Pavel Hrdina via Devel wrote:
> From: Pavel Hrdina <[email protected]>
> 
> Signed-off-by: Pavel Hrdina <[email protected]>
> ---
> 
> I wonder if we should just drop that argument and use
> QEMU_DOMAIN_STORAGE_SOURCE_CHAIN_MAX_DEPTH inside the function directly
> as the only remaining caller with different value is from virstoragetest.c

That might be also doable, but in a follow up patch.

> 
>  src/security/virt-aa-helper.c | 10 +++++-----
>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/src/security/virt-aa-helper.c b/src/security/virt-aa-helper.c
> index 211c34f926..443646c0a1 100644
> --- a/src/security/virt-aa-helper.c
> +++ b/src/security/virt-aa-helper.c
> @@ -901,12 +901,12 @@ get_files(vahControl * ctl)
>              continue;
>          /* XXX - if we knew the qemu user:group here we could send it in
>           *        so that the open could be re-tried as that user:group.
> -         *
> -         * The maximum depth is limited to 200 layers similarly to the qemu
> -         * implementation.
>           */
> -        if (!disk->src->backingStore)
> -            virStorageSourceGetMetadata(disk->src, -1, -1, 200, false);
> +        if (!disk->src->backingStore) {
> +            virStorageSourceGetMetadata(disk->src, -1, -1,
> +                                        
> QEMU_DOMAIN_STORAGE_SOURCE_CHAIN_MAX_DEPTH,
> +                                        false);
> +        }
>  
>           /* XXX should handle open errors more careful than just ignoring 
> them.
>           */

Reviewed-by: Michal Privoznik <[email protected]>

Michal

Reply via email to