Jeff and others, 1. The benchmark was updated to support shared memory case. 2. The wiki was updated with the benchmark description: https://github.com/open-mpi/ompi/wiki/Request-refactoring-test#benchmark-prototype
Let me know if we want to put this prototype to some general place. I think it makes sense. 2016-07-28 17:22 GMT+07:00 Jeff Squyres (jsquyres) <jsquy...@cisco.com>: > On Jul 28, 2016, at 2:52 AM, Sreenidhi Bharathkar Ramesh via devel < > devel@lists.open-mpi.org> wrote: > > > >> For Open MPI, it's basically THREAD_MULTIPLE and not-THREAD_MULTIPLE. > I.e., there's no real difference between SINGLE, SERIALIZED, FUNNELED > > > > We were assuming that there would be cost due to > > locking/synchronization in FUNNELED and SERIALIZED also. > > The MPI spec says that *applications* must ensure the correctness for > FUNNELED and SERIALIZED -- so Open MPI does not provide additional locking > for these levels. > > -- > Jeff Squyres > jsquy...@cisco.com > For corporate legal information go to: > http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/ > > _______________________________________________ > devel mailing list > devel@lists.open-mpi.org > https://rfd.newmexicoconsortium.org/mailman/listinfo/devel > -- С Уважением, Поляков Артем Юрьевич Best regards, Artem Y. Polyakov
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@lists.open-mpi.org https://rfd.newmexicoconsortium.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
