Jeff Squyres wrote:
I think Terry was asking about running at larger scale on a regular basis for correctness testing (i.e., nightly snapshot tarballs via MTT).

I was even hoping for a not so regular basis like when certain people go down to Sandia to see if they can start up an np=4096 job.
--td
I, for one, would love to see the labs run some of our nightly tarballs at larger scale so that we have a more consistent datapoint of what "works" and what "doesn't work" at scale (even if it's a coarse-grained measurement of the tests we have in ompi-tests). Even if the tests are not run nightly -- running even a subset of them even once a week even at "medium" scale would be great. I realize that even with large clusters, we're all resource-constrained (needing to let real users run and all that), but any testing on a regular basis (even if it's sparse) would be really, really great/ useful/good for the code/good for the community/etc.

(yes, this is a not-so-subtle hint :-) )



On Sep 17, 2007, at 11:15 AM, Andrew Friedley wrote:

I won't speak for the labs as a whole, but I generally don't run things
at scale unless theres something specific I'm after, ie benchmarks or
apps I'm using as a benchmark, rather than test suites.

You might look at some of the purple benchmarks:

http://www.llnl.gov/asci/platforms/purple/rfp/benchmarks/limited/ code_list.html

Andrew

Terry Dontje wrote:
What about Sandia and LANL?  Is there anything that is ran on their
large clusters to confirm things seem to work at high np's?

--td

Jeff Squyres wrote:
Cisco is not yet testing that large, but we plan to shortly start
testing at np>=128 (I'm waiting for an internal cluster within Cisco
to be setup properly).


On Sep 11, 2007, at 5:31 PM, rolf.vandeva...@sun.com wrote:


I am curious which tests are being used when running tests on larger
clusters.  And by larger clusters, I mean anything with np > 128.
(Although I realize that is not very large, but it is bigger than most
of the clusters I assume tests are being run on)
I ask this because I planned on using some of the intel tests, but
they
clearly have limitations starting at np=64.

To avoid mailing list clutter, feel free to just email me and I will
summarize.

Rolf


_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
de...@open-mpi.org
http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/devel

_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
de...@open-mpi.org
http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/devel
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
de...@open-mpi.org
http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/devel



Reply via email to