If the guidelines are made for the BTLs Sun will handle the udapl btl.
We can also help in testing too.
--td
George Bosilca wrote:
Yes, "us" means UTK. Our math folks are pushing hard for this. I'll
gladly accept any help, even if it's only for testing. For
development, I dispose of some of my time and a 100% of a post-doc for
few months.
However, there are limits to what we can do. We will make sure the BTL
threading requirements are clearly specified, and we will take care of
the BTLs we already worked on (TCP, self, SM, MX). I hope that once
the BTL interface is defined, others can make sure their BTL follow
the guidelines.
Thanks,
george.
On Nov 28, 2007, at 1:34 PM, Jeff Squyres wrote:
On Nov 28, 2007, at 1:26 PM, George Bosilca wrote:
There is a priority change for us.
"us" = UTK?
It's definitively time to have a fully supported MPI_THREAD_MULTIPLE
mode in Open MPI. I'm working to figure out how and where to get the
cycles for this. I expect to start working on it in January. So, the
good news is that 1.3 will have thread support.
That will be great. Do you really think that you can finish the
THREAD_MULTIPLE work by yourself?
Cisco can provide some resources for testing (in the environments that
we care about :-) ), but probably not for development.
--
Jeff Squyres
Cisco Systems
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
de...@open-mpi.org
http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/devel
------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
de...@open-mpi.org
http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/devel
