Terry,I did not and I will not enforce any policy at this point. I'm confident developers in this community can take such decisions by themselves, without restrictions from the RM. As a hint, the most basic common sense (make sure it compile and it really solve the problem it is supposed to solve without introducing new ones) is a good decision metric.
george. On Jul 24, 2008, at 3:55 PM, Terry Dontje wrote:
It might be worthwhile to spell out the conditions of when someone should let changes soak or not. Considering your changeset 19011 was putback without much soak time. I am not saying 19011 needed more soak time just that I think it adds potential confusion as to what one really needs to do versus amount of code a change.--td George Bosilca wrote:Unfortunately over the last couple of days I realize that the patches from the trunk are moved to the 1.3 too rapidly and usually without much testing. I would like to remember to everybody that the 1.3, while opened for community commits, is supposed to become stable at one point and that we should do the best efforts to keep it that way as long as possible.Please allows few days of testing time before moving your patches from the trunk to the 1.3.george. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ devel mailing list de...@open-mpi.org http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/devel_______________________________________________ devel mailing list de...@open-mpi.org http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/devel
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
