Do we really want to go with a release candidate instead of an official release? That sounds pretty risky to me...
On Thu, Apr 30, 2009 at 10:04 AM, Jeff Squyres <jsquy...@cisco.com> wrote: > How long do we want to wait for 1.3.3? It looks like they're have a new RC > for ROMIO on May 15th -- can we wait that long? At a minimum, it'll take a > day or three to integrate the new ROMIO into OMPI. > > > Begin forwarded message: > > From: Rob Latham <r...@mcs.anl.gov> >> Date: April 30, 2009 12:00:22 PM EDT >> To: Jeff Squyres <jsquy...@cisco.com> >> Cc: romio-ma...@mcs.anl.gov >> Subject: Re: [ROMIO Req #947] New version of ROMIO? >> >> On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 03:18:11PM -0400, Jeff Squyres wrote: >> >>> I can wait a week or so -- it sounds like I should? It is definitely >>> much easier for us to say "we have the ROMIO from MPICH2 x.y.z" than to >>> say "we have ROMIO from MPICH2's SVN rXYZ" -- the first is significantly >>> easier for users the understand and compare behavior to. >>> >> >> Pavan says we'll have a release-candidate on may 15th. Perhaps that >> will be the best one to use, if you can wait that long. >> >> ==rob >> >> -- >> Rob Latham >> Mathematics and Computer Science Division >> Argonne National Lab, IL USA >> > > > -- > Jeff Squyres > Cisco Systems > > _______________________________________________ > devel mailing list > de...@open-mpi.org > http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/devel >
