On Feb 24, 2010, at 5:05 PM, Barrett, Brian W wrote: > > We should record this specfile somewhere, though, just for posterity. Two > > questions: > > > > 1. Should I commit this stuff in the 1.4 contrib/dist/linux branch? (if I > > hear nothing back, I assume "yes") > > Which stuff? If it's just the updated INI file, I'd say no -- there's no > need to record what OFED did to the tarball (just like we don't record what > Red Hat did to the tarball). If there were some changes to the RPM > generation script which would be useful in the future (such as making it > easier to dump a new INI file into the SRPM), then I would say yes.
The stuff is a few updates to the specfile and a slightly modified buildrpm.sh script to copy 3 *.patch files to the SOURCES directory so that they can be used in Patch[012]: and %patch[012] clauses in the specfile. I didn't bother making it generic. These 3 patches update the .ini file included in the 1.4.1 tarball. So if it's not worthwhile, I don't need to commit this stuff. All the INI changes are on the trunk and slated to go over to the branches; it'll just take time to get a formal release out with these patches. -- Jeff Squyres jsquy...@cisco.com For corporate legal information go to: http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/
