is there any other tests you could think of to progress on this issue ?
thanks,
éloi
On Wed, 13 Jul 2011 09:16:11 +0200, Eloi Gaudry <e...@fft.be> wrote:
Unfortunately, I could not observe such a VmRSS increase.
Here is the command line used to perform this test:
/opt/openmpi-1.4.2/bin/mpirun -np 256 --hostfile host.list --display-map
--mca mpi_warn_on_fork 0 --mca btl_openib_want_fork_support 0 --mca btl
openib,sm,self --mca btl_openib_receive_queues P,32768,128,96,64 --mca
btl_openib_max_send_size 32768 --mca btl_openib_eager_limit 32768 --mca
btl_openib_rndv_eager_limit 32768 $HOME/info_mp
and the outputs from rank 0 and rank 255 (the root of the 1-byte
MPI_Gather):
[hbn0170: 0/256] Allgather with one byte to process with rank 255
(VmRSS: 1343463424bytes)
[hbn0170: 0/256] Done Allgather with one byte to process with rank 255
(VmRSS: 1343488000bytes)
[hbn0232: 255/256] Allgather with one byte to process with rank 255
(VmRSS: 261124096bytes)
[hbn0232: 255/256] Done Allgather with one byte to process with rank 255
(VmRSS: 288129024bytes)
note that 256*128*(96+64+32768)=1340108800 bytes and it matches the
VmRSS observed on proc 0.
éloi
On Sat, 09 Jul 2011 13:13:04 +0200, Jeff Squyres <jsquy...@cisco.com>
wrote:
Sorry for the delayed reply.
I'm guessing that there's some kind of rooted collective operation
occurring during MPI_INIT. Try doing a 1 byte MPI_GATHER to another
rank in MCW (e.g., to rank 5) and see if the VmSS goes to the same size
as MCW rank 0.
On Jul 8, 2011, at 5:17 AM, Eloi Gaudry wrote:
what i cannot understand is the reason why this extra memory would be
initialized on proc 0 only.
as far as i know, this doesn't make sense.
éloi
On 22/04/2011 08:52, Eloi Gaudry wrote:
it varies with the receive_queues specification *and* with the
number of mpi processes: memory_consumed = nb_mpi_process *
nb_buffers * (buffer_size + low_buffer_count_watermark +
credit_window_size )
éloi
On 04/22/2011 12:26 AM, Jeff Squyres wrote:
Does it vary exactly according to your receive_queues specification?
On Apr 19, 2011, at 9:03 AM, Eloi Gaudry wrote:
hello,
i would like to get your input on this:
when launching a parallel computation on 128 nodes using openib
and the "-mca btl_openib_receive_queues P,65536,256,192,128"
option, i observe a rather large resident memory consumption (2GB:
65336*256*128) on the process with rank 0 (and only this process)
just after a call to MPI_Init.
i'd like to know why the other processes doesn't behave the same:
- other processes located on the same nodes don't use that amount
of memory
- all others processes (i.e. located on any other nodes) neither
i'm using OpenMPI-1.4.2, built with gcc-4.3.4 and
'--enable-cxx-exceptions --with-pic --with-threads=posix' options.
thanks for your help,
éloi
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
de...@open-mpi.org
http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/devel
--
Eloi Gaudry
Senior Product Development Engineer
Free Field Technologies
Company Website: http://www.fft.be
Direct Phone Number: +32 10 495 147
