Hah! My email crossed this one in the ether. :-)
But if you wnt the flexibility to look at argv[1], feel free to do so...
On Aug 10, 2011, at 6:08 PM, eug...@osl.iu.edu wrote:
> Author: eugene
> Date: 2011-08-10 18:08:39 EDT (Wed, 10 Aug 2011)
> New Revision: 1836
>
> Log:
> Sorry, dynamic/loop_spawn.c num iterations change was inadvertent putback.
>
>
> Text files modified:
> trunk/ibm/dynamic/loop_spawn.c | 2 +-
>
> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
> Modified: trunk/ibm/dynamic/loop_spawn.c
> ==============================================================================
> --- trunk/ibm/dynamic/loop_spawn.c (original)
> +++ trunk/ibm/dynamic/loop_spawn.c 2011-08-10 18:08:39 EDT (Wed, 10 Aug
> 2011)
> @@ -8,7 +8,7 @@
> #include "mpi.h"
>
> #define EXE_TEST "loop_child"
> -#define NUM_TESTS 1 /* 300 */
> +#define NUM_TESTS 1300
>
> int main(int argc, char **argv)
> {
> _______________________________________________
> svn-docs-full mailing list
> svn-docs-f...@open-mpi.org
> http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/svn-docs-full
--
Jeff Squyres
jsquy...@cisco.com
For corporate legal information go to:
http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/
