This may seem trivial, but should we name them: #define MCA_BTL_DES_FLAGS_PUT 0x0010 #define MCA_BTL_DES_FLAGS_GET 0x0020
Although I see there is some inconsistency in how these flags are named, two of the three original ones have "BTL_DES_FLAGS" in them. Rolf rvandeva...@nvidia.com 781-275-5358 >-----Original Message----- >From: devel-boun...@open-mpi.org [mailto:devel-boun...@open-mpi.org] >On Behalf Of Nathan Hjelm >Sent: Tuesday, November 29, 2011 12:43 PM >To: Open MPI Developers >Subject: [OMPI devel] RFC: new btl descriptor flags > >We need an accurate way to detect if prepare_src/prepare_dst are being >called for a get or a put operation. I propose adding two new flags to the btl >descriptor (and passing them from ob1/csum/etc): > >#define MCA_BTL_DES_PUT 0x0010 >#define MCA_BTL_DES_GET 0x0020 > >Comments? Suggestions? Objections? > >-Nathan >_______________________________________________ >devel mailing list >de...@open-mpi.org >http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/devel ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- This email message is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply email and destroy all copies of the original message. -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
