I went ahead and applied this, with a tweak. There is no reason to call our 
flag "FC" as all we use it for is to call the write wrapper. So I renamed it to 
something less problematic.

On Feb 21, 2012, at 1:20 AM, Paul H. Hargrove wrote:

> And while we are looking at examples/Makefile on Solaris-10, why are the F77 
> examples getting built w/ mpif90?
> Because w/ the Solaris make setting FC also silently sets F77 (yes, I am NOT 
> kidding)!
> So, reordering the F77= and FC= lines in Makefile resolves that mis-behavior.
> 
> Attached is my patch to fix both F77/FC and the "better" ompi_info queries 
> mentioned in my previous post.
> This REPLACES the patch in the previous post.
> 
> -Paul
> 
> On 2/20/2012 11:36 PM, Paul H. Hargrove wrote:
>> 
>> The addition on Monday of the Java cases to examples/Makefile has shown that 
>> the default "make" in Solaris-10 will stop on the first failed grep command 
>> in the "all" rule: 
>>> $ make 
>>> mpicc -g   -o hello_c hello_c.c 
>>> mpicc -g   -o ring_c ring_c.c 
>>> mpicc -g   -o connectivity_c connectivity_c.c 
>>> mpic++ -g   -o hello_cxx hello_cxx.cc 
>>> mpic++ -g   -o ring_cxx ring_cxx.cc 
>>> mpif90 -g hello_f77.f -o hello_f77 
>>> mpif90 -g ring_f77.f -o ring_f77 
>>> mpif90 -g hello_f90.f90 -o hello_f90 
>>> mpif90 -g ring_f90.f90 -o ring_f90 
>>> *** Error code 1 
>>> The following command caused the error: 
>>> if test "`ompi_info --parsable | grep bindings:java:yes`" != ""; then \ 
>>>     make Hello.class; \ 
>>> fi 
>>> make: Fatal error: Command failed for target `all' 
>> 
>> The addition of java did NOT break anything, but exposed a pre-existing 
>> problem which  was not evident in my prior testing because all language 
>> bindings were being build prior to adding java. 
>> 
>> The attached patch resolves the problem in my (admittedly minimal) testing 
>> with the smallest possible change. 
>> However an entirely different avoids both "test" and "true" and simply looks 
>> like: 
>>     @ if ompi_info --parsable | grep bindings:cxx:yes >/dev/null; then 
>> I have *also* tested that approach, and it works fine too. 
>> 
>> I *did* warn that the introduction of the java bindings would bring 
>> collateral damage. 
>> I just didn't anticipate encountering it personally. 
>> 
>> -Paul 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> devel mailing list
>> de...@open-mpi.org
>> http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/devel
> 
> -- 
> Paul H. Hargrove                          phhargr...@lbl.gov
> Future Technologies Group
> HPC Research Department                   Tel: +1-510-495-2352
> Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory     Fax: +1-510-486-6900
> <example_makefile.diff2>_______________________________________________
> devel mailing list
> de...@open-mpi.org
> http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/devel

Reply via email to