This is consistent with my findings w/ XLC (mostly on BG/L and BG/P front end nodes). None of the 7.0, 8.0, 9.0 or 11.1 versions of XLC I tested could generate correct atomics.
They either failed at build time, or failed the tests in test/asm/.

-Paul


On 2/23/2012 8:17 PM, Christopher Samuel wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 24/02/12 15:12, Christopher Samuel wrote:

I suspect this is irrelevant, but I got a build failure trying to
compile it on our BG/P front end node (login node) with the IBM XL
compilers.
Oops, forgot how I built it..

export
PATH=/opt/ibmcmp/vac/bg/9.0/bin/:/opt/ibmcmp/vacpp/bg/9.0/bin:/opt/ibmcmp/xlf/bg/11.1/bin:$PATH

CC=xlc CXX=xlC F77=xlf ./configure&&  make

- -- Christopher Samuel - Senior Systems Administrator
  VLSCI - Victorian Life Sciences Computation Initiative
  Email: sam...@unimelb.edu.au Phone: +61 (0)3 903 55545
          http://www.vlsci.unimelb.edu.au/

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iEYEARECAAYFAk9HD1wACgkQO2KABBYQAh9EZgCcCz9x2i6KuE7/UpPzr194jHQD
rdcAni+dfEMhlqMzYMILn8jeS9yWlInu
=+rA4
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
de...@open-mpi.org
http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/devel

--
Paul H. Hargrove                          phhargr...@lbl.gov
Future Technologies Group
HPC Research Department                   Tel: +1-510-495-2352
Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory     Fax: +1-510-486-6900

Reply via email to