Looks ok to me.

FWIW, I'd put EDR in, if you know the values (even though there won't be any 
hardware for a while).  That'll just give this code a longer shelf life / 
future-proof-ness...


On May 10, 2012, at 8:57 AM, Yevgeny Kliteynik wrote:

> On 10-May-12 3:42 PM, Yevgeny Kliteynik wrote:
>> 
>> Here are the ActiveSpeed values:
>> 
>>  1: SDR   - 2.5 Gb/s * (8/10 coding)
>>  2: DDR   - 5   Gb/s * (8/10 coding)
>>  4: QDR   - 10  Gb/s * (8/10 coding)
>>  8: FDR10 - 10  Gb/s * (64/66 coding)
>> 16: FDR   - 14  Gbps * (64/66 coding)
>> 32: EDR   - 25  Gbs  * (64/66 coding)
>> 
>> EDR is not out yet, so we can ignore it for the sake of this patch.
>> It is also true that *most* of IB cables are 4x.
>> There are 12x clusters out there (like TACC's Ranger), and sometimes
>> there are 1x links (mostly because the cable is not perfect or too long).
>> 
>> So cases of 4 and 8 are not the same for us, because MPI needs actual
>> *data* rate instead of *bit* rate, which is different in these cases.
>> 
>> I'll send a patch for review in a minute...
>> 
> 
> How about this patch? If it looks OK, I'll commit to trunk and open CMR.
> 
> ndex: btl_openib_component.c
> ===================================================================
> --- btl_openib_component.c      (revision 26420)
> +++ btl_openib_component.c      (working copy)
> @@ -810,8 +810,10 @@
>                    we have to look up the values corresponding to
>                    port->active_speed and port->active_width.  These
>                    are enums corresponding to the IB spec.  Overall
> -                   forumula is 80% of the reported speed (to get the
> -                   true link speed) times the number of links. */
> +                   forumula to get the true link speed is 8/10 or
> +                   64/66 of the reported speed (depends on the coding
> +                   that is being used for the particular speed) times
> +                   the number of links. */
>                 switch (ib_port_attr->active_speed) {
>                 case 1:
>                     /* 2.5Gbps * 0.8, in megabits */
> @@ -826,9 +828,13 @@
>                     openib_btl->super.btl_bandwidth = 8000;
>                     break;
>                 case 8:
> -                    /* 40.0Gbps * 0.8, in megabits */
> -                    openib_btl->super.btl_bandwidth = 32000;
> +                    /* FDR10: 10.0Gbps * 64/66, in megabits */
> +                    openib_btl->super.btl_bandwidth = 9700;
>                     break;
> +                case 16:
> +                    /* FDR: 14.0Gbps * 64/66, in megabits */
> +                    openib_btl->super.btl_bandwidth = 13600;
> +                    break;
>                 default:
>                     /* Who knows?  Declare this port unreachable (do
>                        *not* return ERR_VALUE_OF_OUT_OF_BOUNDS; that


-- 
Jeff Squyres
jsquy...@cisco.com
For corporate legal information go to: 
http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/


Reply via email to