Amusingly enough, this may be a moot discussion anyway, because I tried the SVN features on github per their directions, and they didn't seem to work:
----- % svn co --depth empty https://github.com/open-mpi/ompi-svn-mirror Checked out revision 17370. % cd ompi-svn-mirror/ % svn up trunk [hang for 5 minutes] svn: Server sent unexpected return value (405 Not Allowed) in response to REPORT request for '/open-mpi/ompi-svn-mirror/!svn/vcc/default' % ----- On Aug 20, 2012, at 6:15 PM, Ralph Castain wrote: > We keep having this discussion, and every time the answer is "no - stick with > what we currently do". Can we please stop having it over and over again? > > Until someone can point out a problem that (a) needs solving and (b) can only > be solved by making a huge change to a DVCS, there is no reason to keep going > over this ground. > > > On Aug 20, 2012, at 8:16 AM, Jeff Squyres <jsquy...@cisco.com> wrote: > >> On Aug 20, 2012, at 11:10 AM, Nathan Hjelm wrote: >> >>>> Unfortunately, we've seen enough pain from git+svn to definitely not want >>>> to go that route. >>> >>> Personally I have had no problems with git svn. In fact every commit I have >>> made in the last 6 months has been with git svn dcommit. Any issues have >>> been user error as I have to push/pull from my cluser tree (which gets out >>> of sync a lot-- can't update it easily from off-site). >> >> Keep in mind that that is not what Mike is proposing. :-) >> >> github has some cleverness that allows both svn and git clients to the same >> repository. >> >> That being said, I think that this is a pretty large discussion: >> >> - do we want to move to a DVCS? >> - if so, which one: hg or git? >> >> - if we move, will IU host it, or will we use Bitbucket / github? >> >> - what do we do about a bug tracker? >> - continue to use Trac? >> - use the bug tracker on Bitbucket / github? >> - ...? >> >> - who will do all the migration work? >> - official source code migration >> - existing open ticket migration >> - user migration >> - ...probably some other things I'm not thinking of >> >> - who will develop the "best practices" guidelines for use of a DVCS? >> Examples: >> - is rebasing before committing encouraged/required/discouraged/...etc. >> - how do we do version release branches -- different repos, or branches >> within a repo, or ...? >> - ...etc. >> >> -- >> Jeff Squyres >> jsquy...@cisco.com >> For corporate legal information go to: >> http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/ >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> devel mailing list >> de...@open-mpi.org >> http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/devel > > > _______________________________________________ > devel mailing list > de...@open-mpi.org > http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/devel -- Jeff Squyres jsquy...@cisco.com For corporate legal information go to: http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/