Hi, On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 8:10 PM, Paul Hargrove <phhargr...@lbl.gov> wrote: > I've not tested any other recent RCs, but had a chance today to run this one > on a subset of my normal pile of test platforms. > > I am not sure why this has only hit me on NetBSD, because the problem looks > pretty generic. > When looking at > ompi/contrib/vt/vt/extlib/otf/tools/otfaux/Makefile.am > I find the following: > otfaux_LDADD = \ > $(top_builddir)/otfauxlib/libotfaux.la \ > $(top_builddir)/otflib/libotf.la \ > $(MATHLIB) > otfaux_DEPENDENCIES = $(otfaux_LDADD) > > Since "MATHLIB = -lm" the dependencies list "-lm" as a target and results in > a build which ends with > Making all in otfaux > CXX otfaux.o > CXX Control.o > CXX Handler.o > CXX Stats.o > make: don't know how to make -lm. Stop > > In my testing the following patch resolves the problem by expressing LDADD > in terms of DEPENDENCIES, instead of the other way around: > --- ompi/contrib/vt/vt/extlib/otf/tools/otfaux/Makefile.am.orig 2012-09-11 > 10:59:05.000000000 -0700 > +++ ompi/contrib/vt/vt/extlib/otf/tools/otfaux/Makefile.am 2012-09-11 > 11:00:08.000000000 -0700 > @@ -8,11 +8,12 @@ > otfaux > endif > > -otfaux_LDADD = \ > +otfaux_DEPENDENCIES = \ > $(top_builddir)/otfauxlib/libotfaux.la \ > - $(top_builddir)/otflib/libotf.la \ > + $(top_builddir)/otflib/libotf.la > +otfaux_LDADD = \ > + $(otfaux_otfaux_DEPENDENCIES) \ > $(MATHLIB) > -otfaux_DEPENDENCIES = $(otfaux_LDADD) > otfaux_SOURCES = \ > Control.h \ > Handler.h \
Thanks. That looks correctly analyzed and fixed. should be in trunk in the next 24h. Bert > > > -Paul >
