Hi Ralph,

I tested it with the trunk r29228. I still have the following problem. Now, it 
even spawns the daemon on the new node through torque but then suddently quits. 
The following is the output. Can you please have a look? 

Thanks
Suraj

[grsacc20:04511] [[6253,0],0] plm:base:receive processing msg
[grsacc20:04511] [[6253,0],0] plm:base:receive job launch command from 
[[6253,1],0]
[grsacc20:04511] [[6253,0],0] plm:base:receive adding hosts
[grsacc20:04511] [[6253,0],0] plm:base:receive calling spawn
[grsacc20:04511] [[6253,0],0] plm:base:receive done processing commands
[grsacc20:04511] [[6253,0],0] plm:base:setup_job
[grsacc20:04511] [[6253,0],0] plm:base:setup_vm
[grsacc20:04511] [[6253,0],0] plm:base:setup_vm add new daemon [[6253,0],2]
[grsacc20:04511] [[6253,0],0] plm:base:setup_vm assigning new daemon 
[[6253,0],2] to node grsacc18
[grsacc20:04511] [[6253,0],0] plm:tm: launching vm
[grsacc20:04511] [[6253,0],0] plm:tm: final top-level argv:
        orted -mca ess tm -mca orte_ess_jobid 409796608 -mca orte_ess_vpid 
<template> -mca orte_ess_num_procs 3 -mca orte_hnp_uri 
"409796608.0;tcp://192.168.222.20:53097" -mca plm_base_verbose 6
[grsacc20:04511] [[6253,0],0] plm:tm: launching on node grsacc19
[grsacc20:04511] [[6253,0],0] plm:tm: executing:
        orted -mca ess tm -mca orte_ess_jobid 409796608 -mca orte_ess_vpid 1 
-mca orte_ess_num_procs 3 -mca orte_hnp_uri 
"409796608.0;tcp://192.168.222.20:53097" -mca plm_base_verbose 6
[grsacc20:04511] [[6253,0],0] plm:tm: launching on node grsacc18
[grsacc20:04511] [[6253,0],0] plm:tm: executing:
        orted -mca ess tm -mca orte_ess_jobid 409796608 -mca orte_ess_vpid 2 
-mca orte_ess_num_procs 3 -mca orte_hnp_uri 
"409796608.0;tcp://192.168.222.20:53097" -mca plm_base_verbose 6
[grsacc20:04511] [[6253,0],0] plm:tm:launch: finished spawning orteds
[grsacc19:28754] mca:base:select:(  plm) Querying component [rsh]
[grsacc19:28754] [[6253,0],1] plm:rsh_lookup on agent ssh : rsh path NULL
[grsacc19:28754] mca:base:select:(  plm) Query of component [rsh] set priority 
to 10
[grsacc19:28754] mca:base:select:(  plm) Selected component [rsh]
[grsacc19:28754] [[6253,0],1] plm:rsh_setup on agent ssh : rsh path NULL
[grsacc19:28754] [[6253,0],1] plm:base:receive start comm
[grsacc19:28754] [[6253,0],1] plm:base:receive stop comm
[grsacc18:16648] mca:base:select:(  plm) Querying component [rsh]
[grsacc18:16648] [[6253,0],2] plm:rsh_lookup on agent ssh : rsh path NULL
[grsacc18:16648] mca:base:select:(  plm) Query of component [rsh] set priority 
to 10
[grsacc18:16648] mca:base:select:(  plm) Selected component [rsh]
[grsacc18:16648] [[6253,0],2] plm:rsh_setup on agent ssh : rsh path NULL
[grsacc18:16648] [[6253,0],2] plm:base:receive start comm
[grsacc20:04511] [[6253,0],0] plm:base:orted_report_launch from daemon 
[[6253,0],2]
[grsacc20:04511] [[6253,0],0] plm:base:orted_report_launch from daemon 
[[6253,0],2] on node grsacc18
[grsacc20:04511] [[6253,0],0] plm:base:orted_report_launch completed for daemon 
[[6253,0],2] at contact 409796608.2;tcp://192.168.222.18:47974
[grsacc20:04511] [[6253,0],0] plm:base:launch_apps for job [6253,2]
[grsacc20:04511] 1 more process has sent help message help-mpi-btl-openib.txt / 
no active ports found
[grsacc20:04511] Set MCA parameter "orte_base_help_aggregate" to 0 to see all 
help / error messages
[grsacc20:04511] 1 more process has sent help message help-mpi-btl-base.txt / 
btl:no-nics
[grsacc20:04511] [[6253,0],0] plm:base:receive processing msg
[grsacc20:04511] [[6253,0],0] plm:base:receive update proc state command from 
[[6253,0],2]
[grsacc20:04511] [[6253,0],0] plm:base:receive got update_proc_state for job 
[6253,2]
[grsacc20:04511] [[6253,0],0] plm:base:receive got update_proc_state for vpid 0 
state RUNNING exit_code 0
[grsacc20:04511] [[6253,0],0] plm:base:receive done processing commands
[grsacc20:04511] [[6253,0],0] plm:base:launch wiring up iof for job [6253,2]
[grsacc20:04511] [[6253,0],0] plm:base:receive processing msg
[grsacc20:04511] [[6253,0],0] plm:base:receive done processing commands
[grsacc20:04511] [[6253,0],0] plm:base:launch registered event
[grsacc20:04511] [[6253,0],0] plm:base:launch sending dyn release of job 
[6253,2] to [[6253,1],0]
[grsacc20:04511] [[6253,0],0] plm:base:orted_cmd sending orted_exit commands
[grsacc19:28747] [[6253,0],1] plm:base:receive stop comm
[grsacc20:04511] [[6253,0],0] plm:base:receive stop comm
-bash-4.1$ [grsacc18:16648] [[6253,0],2] plm:base:receive stop comm




On Sep 23, 2013, at 1:55 AM, Ralph Castain wrote:

> Found a bug in the Torque support - we were trying to connect to the MOM 
> again, which would hang (I imagine). I pushed a fix to the trunk (r29227) and 
> scheduled it to come to 1.7.3 if you want to try it again.
> 
> 
> On Sep 22, 2013, at 4:21 PM, Suraj Prabhakaran <suraj.prabhaka...@gmail.com> 
> wrote:
> 
>> Dear Ralph,
>> 
>> This is the output I get when I execute with the verbose option.
>> 
>> [grsacc20:21012] [[23526,0],0] plm:base:receive processing msg
>> [grsacc20:21012] [[23526,0],0] plm:base:receive job launch command from 
>> [[23526,1],0]
>> [grsacc20:21012] [[23526,0],0] plm:base:receive adding hosts
>> [grsacc20:21012] [[23526,0],0] plm:base:receive calling spawn
>> [grsacc20:21012] [[23526,0],0] plm:base:receive done processing commands
>> [grsacc20:21012] [[23526,0],0] plm:base:setup_job
>> [grsacc20:21012] [[23526,0],0] plm:base:setup_vm
>> [grsacc20:21012] [[23526,0],0] plm:base:setup_vm add new daemon [[23526,0],2]
>> [grsacc20:21012] [[23526,0],0] plm:base:setup_vm assigning new daemon 
>> [[23526,0],2] to node grsacc17/1-4
>> [grsacc20:21012] [[23526,0],0] plm:base:setup_vm add new daemon [[23526,0],3]
>> [grsacc20:21012] [[23526,0],0] plm:base:setup_vm assigning new daemon 
>> [[23526,0],3] to node grsacc17/0-5
>> [grsacc20:21012] [[23526,0],0] plm:tm: launching vm
>> [grsacc20:21012] [[23526,0],0] plm:tm: final top-level argv:
>>      orted -mca ess tm -mca orte_ess_jobid 1541799936 -mca orte_ess_vpid 
>> <template> -mca orte_ess_num_procs 4 -mca orte_hnp_uri 
>> "1541799936.0;tcp://192.168.222.20:49049" -mca plm_base_verbose 5
>> [warn] opal_libevent2021_event_base_loop: reentrant invocation.  Only one 
>> event_base_loop can run on each event_base at once.
>> [grsacc20:21012] [[23526,0],0] plm:base:orted_cmd sending orted_exit commands
>> [grsacc20:21012] [[23526,0],0] plm:base:receive stop comm
>> 
>> Says something?
>> 
>> Best,
>> Suraj
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> On Sep 22, 2013, at 9:45 PM, Ralph Castain wrote:
>> 
>>> I'll still need to look at the intercomm_create issue, but I just tested 
>>> both the trunk and current 1.7.3 branch for "add-host" and both worked just 
>>> fine. This was on my little test cluster which only has rsh available - no 
>>> Torque.
>>> 
>>> You might add "-mca plm_base_verbose 5" to your cmd line to get some debug 
>>> output as to the problem.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> On Sep 21, 2013, at 5:48 PM, Ralph Castain <r...@open-mpi.org> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> On Sep 21, 2013, at 4:54 PM, Suraj Prabhakaran 
>>>> <suraj.prabhaka...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> Dear all,
>>>>> 
>>>>> Really thanks a lot for your efforts. I too downloaded the trunk to check 
>>>>> if it works for my case and as of revision 29215, it works for the 
>>>>> original case I reported. Although it works, I still see the following in 
>>>>> the output. Does it mean anything?
>>>>> [grsacc17][[13611,1],0][btl_openib_proc.c:157:mca_btl_openib_proc_create] 
>>>>> [btl_openib_proc.c:157] ompi_modex_recv failed for peer [[13611,2],0]
>>>> 
>>>> Yes - it means we don't quite have this right yet :-(
>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> However, on another topic relevant to my use case, I have another problem 
>>>>> to report. I am having problems using the "add-host" info to the 
>>>>> MPI_Comm_spawn() when MPI is compiled with support for Torque resource 
>>>>> manager. This problem is totally new in the 1.7 series and it worked 
>>>>> perfectly until 1.6.5 
>>>>> 
>>>>> Basically, I am working on implementing dynamic resource management 
>>>>> facilities in the Torque/Maui batch system. Through a new tm call, an 
>>>>> application can get new resources for a job.
>>>> 
>>>> FWIW: you'll find that we added an API to the orte RAS framework to 
>>>> support precisely that operation. It allows an application to request that 
>>>> we dynamically obtain additional resources during execution (e.g., as part 
>>>> of a Comm_spawn call via an info_key). We originally implemented this with 
>>>> Slurm, but you could add the calls into the Torque component as well if 
>>>> you like.
>>>> 
>>>> This is in the trunk now - will come over to 1.7.4
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>>> I want to use MPI_Comm_spawn() to spawn new processes in the new hosts. 
>>>>> With my extended torque/maui batch system, I was able to perfectly use 
>>>>> the "add-host" info argument to MPI_Comm_spawn() to spawn new processes 
>>>>> on these hosts. Since MPI and Torque refer to the hosts through the 
>>>>> nodeids, I made sure that OpenMPI uses the correct nodeid's for these new 
>>>>> hosts. 
>>>>> Until 1.6.5, this worked perfectly fine, except that due to the 
>>>>> Intercomm_merge problem, I could not really run a real application to its 
>>>>> completion.
>>>>> 
>>>>> While this is now fixed in the trunk, I found that, however, when using 
>>>>> the "add-host" info argument, everything collapses after printing out the 
>>>>> following error. 
>>>>> 
>>>>> [warn] opal_libevent2021_event_base_loop: reentrant invocation.  Only one 
>>>>> event_base_loop can run on each event_base at once.
>>>> 
>>>> I'll take a look - probably some stale code that hasn't been updated yet 
>>>> for async ORTE operations
>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> And due to this, I am still not really able to run my application! I also 
>>>>> compiled the MPI without any Torque/PBS support and just used the 
>>>>> "add-host" argument normally. Again, this worked perfectly in 1.6.5. But 
>>>>> in the 1.7 series, it works but after printing out the following error.
>>>>> 
>>>>> [grsacc17][[13731,1],0][btl_openib_proc.c:157:mca_btl_openib_proc_create] 
>>>>> [btl_openib_proc.c:157] ompi_modex_recv failed for peer [[13731,2],0]
>>>>> [grsacc17][[13731,1],1][btl_openib_proc.c:157:mca_btl_openib_proc_create] 
>>>>> [btl_openib_proc.c:157] ompi_modex_recv failed for peer [[13731,2],0]
>>>> 
>>>> Yeah, the 1.7 series doesn't have the reentrant test in it - so we 
>>>> "illegally" re-enter libevent. The error again means we don't have 
>>>> Intercomm_create correct just yet.
>>>> 
>>>> I'll see what I can do about this and get back to you
>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> In short, with pbs/torque support, it fails and without pbs/torque 
>>>>> support, it runs after spitting the above lines. 
>>>>> 
>>>>> I would really appreciate some help on this, since I need these features 
>>>>> to actually test my case and (at least in my short experience) no other 
>>>>> MPI implementation seem friendly to such dynamic scenarios. 
>>>>> 
>>>>> Thanks a lot!
>>>>> 
>>>>> Best,
>>>>> Suraj
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> On Sep 20, 2013, at 4:58 PM, Jeff Squyres (jsquyres) wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>>> Just to close my end of this loop: as of trunk r29213, it all works for 
>>>>>> me.  Thanks!
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> On Sep 18, 2013, at 12:52 PM, Ralph Castain <r...@open-mpi.org> wrote:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Thanks George - much appreciated
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> On Sep 18, 2013, at 9:49 AM, George Bosilca <bosi...@icl.utk.edu> wrote:
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> The test case was broken. I just pushed a fix.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> George.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> On Sep 18, 2013, at 16:49 , Ralph Castain <r...@open-mpi.org> wrote:
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> Hangs with any np > 1
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> However, I'm not sure if that's an issue with the test vs the 
>>>>>>>>> underlying implementation
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> On Sep 18, 2013, at 7:40 AM, "Jeff Squyres (jsquyres)" 
>>>>>>>>> <jsquy...@cisco.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> Does it hang when you run with -np 4?
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> Sent from my phone. No type good. 
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> On Sep 18, 2013, at 4:10 PM, "Ralph Castain" <r...@open-mpi.org> 
>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> Strange - it works fine for me on my Mac. However, I see one 
>>>>>>>>>>> difference - I only run it with np=1
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> On Sep 18, 2013, at 2:22 AM, Jeff Squyres (jsquyres) 
>>>>>>>>>>> <jsquy...@cisco.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sep 18, 2013, at 9:33 AM, George Bosilca <bosi...@icl.utk.edu> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1. sm doesn't work between spawned processes. So you must have 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> another network enabled.
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> I know :-).  I have tcp available as well (OMPI will abort if you 
>>>>>>>>>>>> only run with sm,self because the comm_spawn will fail with 
>>>>>>>>>>>> unreachable errors -- I just tested/proved this to myself).
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2. Don't use the test case attached to my email, I left an xterm 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> based spawn and the debugging. It can't work without xterm 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> support. Instead try using the test case from the trunk, the one 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> committed by Ralph.
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> I didn't see any "xterm" strings in there, but ok.  :-)  I ran 
>>>>>>>>>>>> with orte/test/mpi/intercomm_create.c, and that hangs for me as 
>>>>>>>>>>>> well:
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> -----
>>>>>>>>>>>> ❯❯❯ mpicc intercomm_create.c -o intercomm_create
>>>>>>>>>>>> ❯❯❯ mpirun -np 4 intercomm_create
>>>>>>>>>>>> b: MPI_Intercomm_create( intra, 0, intra, MPI_COMM_NULL, 201, 
>>>>>>>>>>>> &inter) [rank 4]
>>>>>>>>>>>> b: MPI_Intercomm_create( intra, 0, intra, MPI_COMM_NULL, 201, 
>>>>>>>>>>>> &inter) [rank 5]
>>>>>>>>>>>> b: MPI_Intercomm_create( intra, 0, intra, MPI_COMM_NULL, 201, 
>>>>>>>>>>>> &inter) [rank 6]
>>>>>>>>>>>> b: MPI_Intercomm_create( intra, 0, intra, MPI_COMM_NULL, 201, 
>>>>>>>>>>>> &inter) [rank 7]
>>>>>>>>>>>> c: MPI_Intercomm_create( MPI_COMM_WORLD, 0, intra, 0, 201, &inter) 
>>>>>>>>>>>> [rank 4]
>>>>>>>>>>>> c: MPI_Intercomm_create( MPI_COMM_WORLD, 0, intra, 0, 201, &inter) 
>>>>>>>>>>>> [rank 5]
>>>>>>>>>>>> c: MPI_Intercomm_create( MPI_COMM_WORLD, 0, intra, 0, 201, &inter) 
>>>>>>>>>>>> [rank 6]
>>>>>>>>>>>> c: MPI_Intercomm_create( MPI_COMM_WORLD, 0, intra, 0, 201, &inter) 
>>>>>>>>>>>> [rank 7]
>>>>>>>>>>>> a: MPI_Intercomm_create( ab_intra, 0, ac_intra, 0, 201, &inter) (0)
>>>>>>>>>>>> a: MPI_Intercomm_create( ab_intra, 0, ac_intra, 0, 201, &inter) (0)
>>>>>>>>>>>> a: MPI_Intercomm_create( ab_intra, 0, ac_intra, 0, 201, &inter) (0)
>>>>>>>>>>>> a: MPI_Intercomm_create( ab_intra, 0, ac_intra, 0, 201, &inter) (0)
>>>>>>>>>>>> [hang]
>>>>>>>>>>>> -----
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> Similarly, on my Mac, it hangs with no output:
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> -----
>>>>>>>>>>>> ❯❯❯ mpicc intercomm_create.c -o intercomm_create
>>>>>>>>>>>> ❯❯❯ mpirun -np 4 intercomm_create
>>>>>>>>>>>> [hang]
>>>>>>>>>>>> -----
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> George.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sep 18, 2013, at 07:53 , "Jeff Squyres (jsquyres)" 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> <jsquy...@cisco.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> George --
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> When I build the SVN trunk (r29201) on 64 bit linux, your 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> attached test case hangs:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -----
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ❯❯❯ mpicc intercomm_create.c -o intercomm_create
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ❯❯❯ mpirun -np 4 intercomm_create
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> b: MPI_Intercomm_create( intra, 0, intra, MPI_COMM_NULL, 201, 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> &inter) [rank 4]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> b: MPI_Intercomm_create( intra, 0, intra, MPI_COMM_NULL, 201, 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> &inter) [rank 5]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> b: MPI_Intercomm_create( intra, 0, intra, MPI_COMM_NULL, 201, 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> &inter) [rank 6]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> b: MPI_Intercomm_create( intra, 0, intra, MPI_COMM_NULL, 201, 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> &inter) [rank 7]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a: MPI_Intercomm_create( ab_intra, 0, ac_intra, 0, 201, &inter) 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (0)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a: MPI_Intercomm_create( ab_intra, 0, ac_intra, 0, 201, &inter) 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (0)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a: MPI_Intercomm_create( ab_intra, 0, ac_intra, 0, 201, &inter) 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (0)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a: MPI_Intercomm_create( ab_intra, 0, ac_intra, 0, 201, &inter) 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (0)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> c: MPI_Intercomm_create( MPI_COMM_WORLD, 0, intra, 0, 201, 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> &inter) [rank 4]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> c: MPI_Intercomm_create( MPI_COMM_WORLD, 0, intra, 0, 201, 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> &inter) [rank 5]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> c: MPI_Intercomm_create( MPI_COMM_WORLD, 0, intra, 0, 201, 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> &inter) [rank 6]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> c: MPI_Intercomm_create( MPI_COMM_WORLD, 0, intra, 0, 201, 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> &inter) [rank 7]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [hang]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -----
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On my Mac, it hangs without printing anything:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -----
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ❯❯❯ mpicc intercomm_create.c -o intercomm_create
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ❯❯❯ mpirun -np 4 intercomm_create   
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [hang]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -----
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sep 18, 2013, at 1:48 AM, George Bosilca 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <bosi...@icl.utk.edu> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Here is a quick (and definitively not the cleanest) patch that 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> addresses the MPI_Intercomm issue at the MPI level. It should 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> be applied after removal of 29166.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I also added the corrected test case stressing the corner cases 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> by doing barriers at every inter-comm creation and doing a 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> clean disconnect.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -- 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Jeff Squyres
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> jsquy...@cisco.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> For corporate legal information go to: 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> devel mailing list
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> de...@open-mpi.org
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/devel
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>>>>>>> devel mailing list
>>>>>>>>>>>>> de...@open-mpi.org
>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/devel
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> -- 
>>>>>>>>>>>> Jeff Squyres
>>>>>>>>>>>> jsquy...@cisco.com
>>>>>>>>>>>> For corporate legal information go to: 
>>>>>>>>>>>> http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>>>>>> devel mailing list
>>>>>>>>>>>> de...@open-mpi.org
>>>>>>>>>>>> http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/devel
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>>>>> devel mailing list
>>>>>>>>>>> de...@open-mpi.org
>>>>>>>>>>> http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/devel
>>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>>>> devel mailing list
>>>>>>>>>> de...@open-mpi.org
>>>>>>>>>> http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/devel
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>>> devel mailing list
>>>>>>>>> de...@open-mpi.org
>>>>>>>>> http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/devel
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>> devel mailing list
>>>>>>>> de...@open-mpi.org
>>>>>>>> http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/devel
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>> devel mailing list
>>>>>>> de...@open-mpi.org
>>>>>>> http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/devel
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> -- 
>>>>>> Jeff Squyres
>>>>>> jsquy...@cisco.com
>>>>>> For corporate legal information go to: 
>>>>>> http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> devel mailing list
>>>>>> de...@open-mpi.org
>>>>>> http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/devel
>>>>> 
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> devel mailing list
>>>>> de...@open-mpi.org
>>>>> http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/devel
>>>> 
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> devel mailing list
>>> de...@open-mpi.org
>>> http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/devel
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> devel mailing list
>> de...@open-mpi.org
>> http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/devel
> 
> _______________________________________________
> devel mailing list
> de...@open-mpi.org
> http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/devel

Reply via email to