I agree with the Solaris move. Brian
On 10/4/13 5:08 AM, "Jeff Squyres (jsquyres)" <jsquy...@cisco.com> wrote: >This is in the README -- is it still accurate? I'm thinking that all >Solaris support should move to the "lightly but not fully tested" >category, for example: > >----- >- Systems that have been tested are: > > - Linux (various flavors/distros), 32 bit, with gcc > > - Linux (various flavors/distros), 64 bit (x86), with gcc, Absoft, > > Intel, Portland, and Oracle Solaris Studio 12.3 compilers (*) > > - OS X (10.5, 10.6, 10.7), 32 and 64 bit (x86_64), with gcc and > > Absoft compilers (*) > > - Oracle Solaris 10 and 11, 64 bit (SPARC, i386, x86_64), > > with Oracle Solaris Studio 12.2 and 12.3 > > > > (*) Be sure to read the Compiler Notes, below. > > > >- Other systems have been lightly (but not fully tested): > > - Other 64 bit platforms (e.g., Linux on PPC64) > > - 32-bit Solaris > >----- > >-- >Jeff Squyres >jsquy...@cisco.com >For corporate legal information go to: >http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/ > >_______________________________________________ >devel mailing list >de...@open-mpi.org >http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/devel > -- Brian W. Barrett Scalable System Software Group Sandia National Laboratories
