On Feb 18, 2014, at 8:18 AM, George Bosilca <bosi...@icl.utk.edu> wrote:
>> For the longer term (i.e., 1.9), should we add a little opal infrastructure >> that contains an event base that is run in its own progress thread? This >> would allow the MPI layer to consolidate into one progress thread (for >> things that are event based, at least). I don’t believe much work would be >> needed here. > > +1. All frameworks/component with a need for event triggering without other > constraints must use it. In other terms the proposed infrastructure might not > be the most effective for high density fd listeners such as the TCP BTL. Ok. I can add an RFC/proposal to my to-do list... after v1.7.5 (and possibly after v1.8 -- we'll see how my to-do list plays out). > Btw, now that we’re talking about this I wonder how do we deal with signals > in a non-ORTE environment. Who is registering the signal callbacks, such as > USR1? Don't know / no one...? -- Jeff Squyres jsquy...@cisco.com For corporate legal information go to: http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/
