On Mar 6, 2014, at 4:08 AM, Vasily Filipov <vas...@dev.mellanox.co.il> wrote:
>> #if HAVE_DECL_AF_IB
>> rc = try_using_af_ib();
>> if (OMPI_ERR_NOT_AVAILABLE == rc) {
>> rc = try_the_other_way();
>> }
>> #else
>> rc = try_the_other_way();
>> #endif
> I mean I cannot use "another way" if func call for "try_using_af_ib"
> fails (call for "try_the_other_way()") because RDMACM was compiled for AF_IB
> usage (different fields in structs, different functions prototypes).
Ok, that means the implementation is reduced to:
#if HAVE_DECL_AF_IB
rc = try_using_af_ib();
#else
rc = try_the_other_way();
#endif
Right? If so, I don't see why you need the AC_TRY_RUN -- if RDMACM is easily
detectable as to which way it is compiled (because it has, for example,
different fields), then AC_CHECK_DECLS should be enough, right?
I must be missing something...?
--
Jeff Squyres
jsquy...@cisco.com
For corporate legal information go to:
http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/
