George, #4815 is indirectly related to the move :
in bcol/basesmuma, we used to compare ompi_process_name_t, and now we (try to) compare an ompi_process_name_t and an opal_process_name_t (which causes a glory SIGSEGV) i proposed a temporary patch which is both broken and unelegant, could you please advise a correct solution ? Cheers, Gilles On 2014/07/27 7:37, George Bosilca wrote: > If you have any issue with the move, I’ll be happy to help and/or support you > on your last move toward a completely generic BTL. To facilitate your work I > exposed a minimalistic set of OMPI information at the OPAL level. Take a look > at opal/util/proc.h for more info, but please try not to expose more.
