The s1 method is correct - other two are wrong Sent from my iPhone
> On Sep 26, 2014, at 9:24 AM, Pritchard Jr., Howard <howa...@lanl.gov> wrote: > > Hi Folks, > > I’m trying to figure out something about the kind of info pmi’s are suppose > to be feeding back up in to orte/ompi, partly because native launch > doesn’t seem to work too well in trunk. > > One of the things I’m puzzling about is the purpose of the my_node_rank > field in orte_proc_info_t. > > I’m particularly puzzled, because with the new pmix s2 and cray components, > we are returning the NODE RANK (i.e. which NODE in a virtual sense, the > proc is on) via a pmix_X_parse_pmap function. See find_my_node in both > the pmix_cray_parse_pmap and pmix_s2_parse_pmap functions. This > value is subsequently returned when the pmix component is queried with the > PMIX_NODE_RANK attribute. > > But, with s1, we seem to just be assigning the same value to my_node_rank > as to my_local_rank, based on the contents of the array returned from > PMI_Get_clique_ranks. > > It appears that in the 1.7/1.8 branch, the behavior is to do the s1 route, > irrespective of whether pmi2 from slurm or the pmi.fuzzy from cray is used. > > Thanks for any help, > > Howard > > > ------------------------------------------------- > Howard Pritchard > HPC-5 > Los Alamos National Laboratory > > > _______________________________________________ > devel mailing list > de...@open-mpi.org > Subscription: http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/devel > Link to this post: > http://www.open-mpi.org/community/lists/devel/2014/09/15923.php
