Fair enough.

*Someone* needs to re-file those CMRs as pull requests; probably in some cases 
it's the reporter, probably in some cases it's the owner.  :-)


On Oct 2, 2014, at 6:33 AM, Gilles Gouaillardet <gilles.gouaillar...@iferc.org> 
wrote:

> Hi Jeff,
> 
> thumbs up for the migration !
> 
> the names here are the CMR owners ('Owned by' field in TRAC)
> should it be the duty of the creators ('Reported by' field in TRAC) to
> re-create the CMR instead?
> 
> /* if not, and from a git log point of view, that means the commiter
> will be the reviewer and not the reporter */
> 
> what do you think ?
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> Gilles
> 
> On 2014/10/02 19:24, Jeff Squyres (jsquyres) wrote:
>> 2. The following still-open CMRs were not brought over, and need to be 
>> re-filed as pull requests:
>> 
>> - https://svn.open-mpi.org/trac/ompi/ticket/4216: Nathan (BLOCKER)
>> - https://svn.open-mpi.org/trac/ompi/ticket/4816: Ralph
>> - https://svn.open-mpi.org/trac/ompi/ticket/4872: Ralph
>> - https://svn.open-mpi.org/trac/ompi/ticket/4888: Howard
>> - https://svn.open-mpi.org/trac/ompi/ticket/4900: Ralph
>> - https://svn.open-mpi.org/trac/ompi/ticket/4905: Mike Dubman
>> - https://svn.open-mpi.org/trac/ompi/ticket/4917: Jeff
>> - https://svn.open-mpi.org/trac/ompi/ticket/4911: Jeff
>> - https://svn.open-mpi.org/trac/ompi/ticket/4922: Jeff
>> - https://svn.open-mpi.org/trac/ompi/ticket/4923: Ralph
>> - https://svn.open-mpi.org/trac/ompi/ticket/4925: OMPI RM 1.8
>> - https://svn.open-mpi.org/trac/ompi/ticket/4926: Oscar
>> - https://svn.open-mpi.org/trac/ompi/ticket/4927: Jeff
> 
> _______________________________________________
> devel mailing list
> de...@open-mpi.org
> Subscription: http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/devel
> Link to this post: 
> http://www.open-mpi.org/community/lists/devel/2014/10/15966.php


-- 
Jeff Squyres
jsquy...@cisco.com
For corporate legal information go to: 
http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/

Reply via email to