I agree - I sent the note because I see people doing things a bit differently than expected. I have no issue with PRs for things where people want extra eyes on something before committing, or as part of an RFC. Just want to ensure folks aren’t letting them languish expecting some kind of gatekeeper to merge them…as that will never happen.
> On Nov 6, 2014, at 3:14 PM, Howard Pritchard <hpprit...@gmail.com> wrote: > > HI Ralph, > > We should discuss this on Tuesday. I thought we'd decided for master to use > a model where developers would directly push to ompi/master. > I'd be willing to pull the request from Giles marked as bugs tomorrow. > > Howard > > > 2014-11-06 13:16 GMT-07:00 Ralph Castain <rhc.open...@gmail.com > <mailto:rhc.open...@gmail.com>>: > Hey folks > > We seem to be creating a bunch of pull requests on the trunk (well, by “we” I > mean mostly Gilles) that are then being left hanging there, going stale. Some > of these are going to start conflicting with changes being made by others, or > even conflict with each other. > > Can we do a “purge” of them? It looks like they are being posted, reviewed, > approved….and then just sit there. Are people expecting someone else to do > the final merge? If so, who? > > Ralph > > _______________________________________________ > devel mailing list > de...@open-mpi.org <mailto:de...@open-mpi.org> > Subscription: http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/devel > <http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/devel> > Link to this post: > http://www.open-mpi.org/community/lists/devel/2014/11/16245.php > <http://www.open-mpi.org/community/lists/devel/2014/11/16245.php> > _______________________________________________ > devel mailing list > de...@open-mpi.org > Subscription: http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/devel > Link to this post: > http://www.open-mpi.org/community/lists/devel/2014/11/16261.php
