Jeff,

Less typing to launch 50+ testers than pick out just those two.
Starting them now...

-Paul

On Fri, Dec 19, 2014 at 12:22 PM, Jeff Squyres (jsquyres) <
jsquy...@cisco.com> wrote:
>
> Paul --
>
> The fix for this is now on the v1.8 branch.  I'm spinning up a new nightly
> tarball for you.
>
>     http://www.open-mpi.org/nightly/v1.8/
>
> Could you test it in the 2 cases where you had fortran failures?
>
>
>
> On Dec 18, 2014, at 8:50 PM, Paul Hargrove <phhargr...@lbl.gov> wrote:
>
> > Update:
> >
> > I now have 59 of 61 results, with only the QEMU-emulated MIPS platforms
> outstanding.
> > Those will not likely finish until near to (or after) midnight tonight.
> > Unless something turns up on the MIPS systems my "smoke test" of rc5 is
> complete.
> >
> > The only issues I found are the vader and fortran ones mentioned
> previously.
> >
> > Nathan now has an account on the same SGI UV as I have been using.
> > Jeff now has my configure and ompi_info output for my fortran failures.
> >
> > NOTE (primarily directed at Jeff):
> > I define "issue" to *exclude* known problem with certain compilers that
> are also present in earlier releases.  In particular, I pass explicit
> --with-mpi-fortran=XXX and/or --disable-oshmem-fortran options to configure
> when using certain PGI and XLC versions because (as of 1.8.3 when I last
> adjusted those settings) configure was not able to automatically disqualify
> their "deficient" fortran support.  If there is a desire/need to follow up
> on this, let me know.  However, all those "deficient" fortan compilers have
> been reported by me on this list at least once in testing prior releases
> (just never in one place).
> >
> > -Paul
> >
> > On Thu, Dec 18, 2014 at 8:55 AM, Paul Hargrove <phhargr...@lbl.gov>
> wrote:
> > With results from about 50 out of 61 platforms:
> >
> > + KNOWN: SGI UV is still "broken-by-default" (fails compiling vader
> unless configured with --without-xpmem)
> > + NEW: I see Fortran bindings failing to compile w/ gfortran
> > + NEW: I see Fortran bindings fail to link with Open64
> >
> > I also have unexplained errors on my Solaris-10/SPARC system.
> > It looks like there may have been a loss of network connectivity during
> the tests.
> > I need to check these deeper, but I expect them to pass when I get a
> chance to re-run them.
> >
> > -Paul
> >
> > --
> > Paul H. Hargrove                          phhargr...@lbl.gov
> > Computer Languages & Systems Software (CLaSS) Group
> > Computer Science Department               Tel: +1-510-495-2352
> > Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory     Fax: +1-510-486-6900
> >
> >
> > --
> > Paul H. Hargrove                          phhargr...@lbl.gov
> > Computer Languages & Systems Software (CLaSS) Group
> > Computer Science Department               Tel: +1-510-495-2352
> > Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory     Fax: +1-510-486-6900
> > _______________________________________________
> > devel mailing list
> > de...@open-mpi.org
> > Subscription: http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/devel
> > Link to this post:
> http://www.open-mpi.org/community/lists/devel/2014/12/16683.php
>
>
> --
> Jeff Squyres
> jsquy...@cisco.com
> For corporate legal information go to:
> http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/
>
> _______________________________________________
> devel mailing list
> de...@open-mpi.org
> Subscription: http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/devel
> Link to this post:
> http://www.open-mpi.org/community/lists/devel/2014/12/16697.php
>


-- 
Paul H. Hargrove                          phhargr...@lbl.gov
Computer Languages & Systems Software (CLaSS) Group
Computer Science Department               Tel: +1-510-495-2352
Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory     Fax: +1-510-486-6900

Reply via email to