Yes. -Nathan
On Mon, Jun 08, 2015 at 09:17:17AM -0700, Ralph Castain wrote:
> So how is the user going to specify these? -mca oob_base_verbose debug?
>
> > On Jun 8, 2015, at 9:11 AM, Nathan Hjelm <hje...@lanl.gov> wrote:
> >
> >
> > That would work. The standard verbosity levels could be one of those
> > values but allow any number in the interval [0,100] or any of none,
> > error, warn, info, debug, and trace. The standard levels could be
> > defined as:
> >
> > enum {
> > MCA_BASE_VERBOSE_NONE = 0,
> > MCA_BASE_VERBOSE_ERROR = 1,
> > MCA_BASE_VERBOSE_WARN = 10,
> > MCA_BASE_VERBOSE_INFO = 20,
> > MCA_BASE_VERBOSE_DEBUG = 40,
> > MCA_BASE_VERBOSE_TRACE = 60,
> > MCA_BASE_VERBOSE_MAX = 100,
> > };
> >
> > static mca_base_var_enum_value_t verbose_values[] = {
> > {"none", MCA_BASE_VERBOSE_NONE},
> > {"error", MCA_BASE_VERBOSE_ERROR},
> > {"warn", MCA_BASE_VERBOSE_WARN},
> > {"info", MCA_BASE_VERBOSE_INFO},
> > {"debug", MCA_BASE_VERBOSE_DEBUG},
> > {"trace", MCA_BASE_VERBOSE_TRACE},
> > {NULL, -1}
> > };
> >
> > -Nathan
> >
> > On Tue, Jun 09, 2015 at 12:42:05AM +0900, KAWASHIMA Takahiro wrote:
> >>> static const char* const priorities[] = {
> >>> "ERROR",
> >>> "WARN",
> >>> "INFO",
> >>> "DEBUG",
> >>> "TRACE"
> >>> };
> >>
> >> +1
> >>
> >> I usually use these levels.
> >>
> >> Typical usage:
> >>
> >> ERROR:
> >> Print an error message on returning a value other than
> >> OMPI_SUCCESS (and OMPI_ERR_TEMP_OUT_OF_RESOURCE etc.).
> >>
> >> WARN:
> >> This does not indicate an error. But users/developers should
> >> be aware on debugging/tuning. For example, network-level
> >> timeout, hardware queue full, buggy code.
> >> Often used with OMPI_ERR_TEMP_OUT_OF_RESOURCE.
> >>
> >> INFO:
> >> Information that may be useful for users and developers.
> >> Not so verbose. Output only on initialization or
> >> object creation etc.
> >>
> >> DEBUG:
> >> Information that is useful only for developers.
> >> Not so verbose. Output once per MPI routine call.
> >>
> >> TRACE:
> >> Information that is useful only for developers.
> >> Verbose. Output more than once per MPI routine call.
> >>
> >> Regards,
> >> KAWASHIMA Takahiro
> >>
> >>> so what about :
> >>>
> >>> static const char* const priorities[] = {
> >>> "ERROR",
> >>> "WARN",
> >>> "INFO",
> >>> "DEBUG",
> >>> "TRACE"
> >>> };
> >>>
> >>> and merge debug and trace if there should be only 4
> >>>
> >>> Cheers,
> >>>
> >>> Gilles
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On Monday, June 8, 2015, Ralph Castain <r...@open-mpi.org> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> Could we maybe narrow it down some? If we are going to do it, let’s not
> >>>> make the mistake of the MCA param system and create so many levels.
> >>>> Nobody
> >>>> can figure out the right gradation as it is just too fine grained.
> >>>>
> >>>> I think Nathan’s proposal is the max that makes sense.
> >>>>
> >>>> I’d also like to see us apply the same logic to the MCA param system.
> >>>> Let’s just define ~4 named levels and get rid of the fine grained
> >>>> numbering.
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> On Jun 8, 2015, at 2:04 AM, Gilles Gouaillardet <gil...@rist.or.jp
> >>>> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','gil...@rist.or.jp');>> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> Nathan,
> >>>>
> >>>> i think it is a good idea to use names vs numeric values for verbosity.
> >>>>
> >>>> what about using "a la" log4c verbosity names ?
> >>>> http://sourceforge.net/projects/log4c/
> >>>>
> >>>> static const char* const priorities[] = {
> >>>> "FATAL",
> >>>> "ALERT",
> >>>> "CRIT",
> >>>> "ERROR",
> >>>> "WARN",
> >>>> "NOTICE",
> >>>> "INFO",
> >>>> "DEBUG",
> >>>> "TRACE",
> >>>> "NOTSET",
> >>>> "UNKNOWN"
> >>>> };
> >>>>
> >>>> Cheers,
> >>>>
> >>>> Gilles
> >>>>
> >>>> On 5/30/2015 1:32 AM, Nathan Hjelm wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> At the moment we have a loosely enforced standard for verbosity
> >>>> values. In general frameworks accept anything in the range 0 - 100 with
> >>>> few exceptions. I am thinking about adding an enumerator for verbosities
> >>>> that will accept values in this range and certain named constants which
> >>>> will match with specific verbosity levels. One possible set: none - 0,
> >>>> low - 25, med - 50, high - 75, max - 100. I am open to any set of named
> >>>> verbosities.
> >>>>
> >>>> Thoughts?
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> devel mailing list
> >> de...@open-mpi.org
> >> Subscription: http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/devel
> >> Link to this post:
> >> http://www.open-mpi.org/community/lists/devel/2015/06/17475.php
> > _______________________________________________
> > devel mailing list
> > de...@open-mpi.org
> > Subscription: http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/devel
> > Link to this post:
> > http://www.open-mpi.org/community/lists/devel/2015/06/17476.php
>
> _______________________________________________
> devel mailing list
> de...@open-mpi.org
> Subscription: http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/devel
> Link to this post:
> http://www.open-mpi.org/community/lists/devel/2015/06/17477.php
pgpXr9fUuSMIN.pgp
Description: PGP signature
