Thanks, Gilles.

We are addressing this.

Josh

Sent from my iPhone

> On Jun 25, 2015, at 11:03 AM, Gilles Gouaillardet <gil...@rist.or.jp> wrote:
> 
> Folks,
> 
> this is a followup on an issue reported by Daniel on the users mailing list :
> OpenMPI is built with hcoll from Mellanox.
> the coll ml module has default priority zero.
> 
> on my cluster, it works just fine
> on Daniel's cluster, it crashes.
> 
> i was able to reproduce the crash by tweaking mca_base_component_path and 
> ensure
> the coll ml module is loaded first.
> 
> basically, i found two issues :
> 1) libhcoll.so (vendor lib provided by Mellanox, i tested 
> hpcx-v1.3.336-gcc-OFED-1.5.4.1-redhat6.2-x86_64) seems to include its own 
> coll ml, since there are some *public* symbols that are common to this module 
> (ml_open, ml_coll_hier_barrier_setup, ...)
> 2) coll ml priority is zero, and even if the library is dlclose'd, it seems 
> this is uneffective
> (nothing changed in /proc/xxx/maps before and after dlclose)
> 
> 
> there are two workarounds :
> mpirun --mca coll ^ml
> or
> mpirun --mca coll ^hcoll ... (probably not what is needed though ...)
> 
> is it expected the library is not unloaded after dlclose ?
> 
> Mellanox folks,
> can you please double check how libhcoll is built ?
> i guess it would work if the ml_ symbols were private to the library.
> if not, the only workaround is to mpirun --mca coll ^ml
> otherwise, it might crash (if coll_ml is loaded before coll_hcoll, which is 
> really system dependent)
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> Gilles
>> On 6/25/2015 10:46 AM, Gilles Gouaillardet wrote:
>> Daniel,
>> 
>> thanks for the logs.
>> 
>> an other workaround is to
>> mpirun --mca coll ^hcoll ...
>> 
>> i was able to reproduce the issue, and it surprisingly occurs only if the 
>> coll_ml module is loaded *before* the hcoll module.
>> /* this is not the case on my system, so i had to hack my 
>> mca_base_component_path in order to reproduce the issue */
>> 
>> as far as i understand, libhcoll is a proprietary software, so i cannot dig 
>> into it.
>> that being said, i noticed libhcoll defines some symbols (such as 
>> ml_coll_hier_barrier_setup) that are also defined by the coll_ml module, so 
>> it is likely hcoll coll_ml and openmpi coll_ml are not binary compatible 
>> hence the error.
>> 
>> i will dig a bit more and see if this is even supposed to happen (since 
>> coll_ml_priority is zero, why is the module still loaded ?)
>> 
>> as far as i am concerned, you *have to* mpirun --mca coll ^ml or       
>> update your user/system wide config file to blacklist the coll_ml module to 
>> ensure this is working.
>> 
>> Mike and Mellanox folks, could you please comment on that ?
>> 
>> Cheers,
>> 
>> Gilles
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>> On 6/24/2015 5:23 PM, Daniel Letai wrote:
>>> Gilles,
>>> 
>>> Attached the two output logs.
>>> 
>>> Thanks,
>>> Daniel
>>> 
>>>> On 06/22/2015 08:08 AM, Gilles Gouaillardet wrote:
>>>> Daniel,
>>>> 
>>>> i double checked this and i cannot make any sense with these logs.
>>>> 
>>>> if coll_ml_priority is zero, then i do not any way how 
>>>> ml_coll_hier_barrier_setup can be invoked.
>>>> 
>>>> could you please run again with --mca coll_base_verbose 100
>>>> with and without --mca coll ^ml
>>>> 
>>>> Cheers,
>>>> 
>>>> Gilles
>>>> 
>>>>> On 6/22/2015 12:08 AM, Gilles Gouaillardet wrote:
>>>>> Daniel,
>>>>> 
>>>>> ok, thanks
>>>>> 
>>>>> it seems that even if priority is zero, some code gets executed
>>>>> I will confirm this tomorrow and send you a patch to work around the 
>>>>> issue if that if my guess is proven right
>>>>> 
>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>> 
>>>>> Gilles
>>>>> 
>>>>>> On Sunday, June 21, 2015, Daniel Letai <d...@letai.org.il> wrote:
>>>>>> MCA coll: parameter "coll_ml_priority" (current value: "0", data source: 
>>>>>> default, level: 9 dev/all, type: int)
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Not sure how to read this, but for any n>1 mpirun only works with --mca 
>>>>>> coll ^ml
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Thanks for helping
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> On 06/18/2015 04:36 PM, Gilles Gouaillardet wrote:
>>>>>>> This is really odd...
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> you can run
>>>>>>> ompi_info --all 
>>>>>>> and search coll_ml_priority
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> it will display the current value and the origin
>>>>>>> (e.g. default, system wide config, user config, cli, environment 
>>>>>>> variable)
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Gilles
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> On Thursday, June 18, 2015, Daniel Letai <d...@letai.org.il> wrote:
>>>>>>>> No, that's the issue.
>>>>>>>> I had to disable it to get things working.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> That's why I included my config settings - I couldn't figure out which 
>>>>>>>> option enabled it, so I could remove it from the configuration...
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> On 06/18/2015 02:43 PM, Gilles Gouaillardet wrote:
>>>>>>>>> Daniel,
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> ML module is not ready for production and is disabled by default.
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> Did you explicitly enable this module ?
>>>>>>>>> If yes, I encourage you to disable it
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> Gilles
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> On Thursday, June 18, 2015, Daniel Letai                             
>>>>>>>>>>   <d...@letai.org.il> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> given a simple hello.c:
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> #include <stdio.h>
>>>>>>>>>> #include <mpi.h>
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> int main(int argc, char* argv[])
>>>>>>>>>> {
>>>>>>>>>>         int size, rank, len;
>>>>>>>>>>         char name[MPI_MAX_PROCESSOR_NAME];
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>         MPI_Init(&argc, &argv);
>>>>>>>>>>         MPI_Comm_size(MPI_COMM_WORLD, &size);
>>>>>>>>>>         MPI_Comm_rank(MPI_COMM_WORLD, &rank);
>>>>>>>>>>         MPI_Get_processor_name(name, &len);
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>         printf("%s: Process %d out of %d\n", name, rank, size);
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>         MPI_Finalize();ffff
>>>>>>>>>> }
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> for n=1
>>>>>>>>>> mpirun -n 1 ./hello
>>>>>>>>>> it works correctly.
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> for n>1 it segfaults with signal 11
>>>>>>>>>> used gdb to trace the problem to ml coll:
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
>>>>>>>>>> 0x00007ffff6750845 in ml_coll_hier_barrier_setup()
>>>>>>>>>>     from <path to openmpi 1.8.5>/lib/openmpi/mca_coll_ml.so
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> running with
>>>>>>>>>> mpirun -n 2 --mca coll ^ml ./hello
>>>>>>>>>> works correctly
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> using mellanox ofed 2.3-2.0.5-rhel6.4-x86_64, if it's at all 
>>>>>>>>>> relevant.
>>>>>>>>>> openmpi 1.8.5 was built with following options:
>>>>>>>>>> rpmbuild --rebuild --define 'configure_options --with-verbs=/usr 
>>>>>>>>>> --with-verbs-libdir=/usr/lib64 CC=gcc CXX=g++ FC=gfortran CFLAGS="-g 
>>>>>>>>>> -O3" --enable-mpirun-prefix-by-default 
>>>>>>>>>> --enable-orterun-prefix-by-default --disable-debug 
>>>>>>>>>> --with-knem=/opt/knem-1.1.1.90mlnx --with-platform=optimized 
>>>>>>>>>> --without-mpi-param-check --with-contrib-vt-flags=--disable-iotrace 
>>>>>>>>>> --enable-builtin-atomics --enable-cxx-exceptions 
>>>>>>>>>> --enable-sparse-groups --enable-mpi-thread-multiple 
>>>>>>>>>> --enable-memchecker --enable-btl-openib-failover 
>>>>>>>>>> --with-hwloc=internal --with-verbs --with-x --with-slurm 
>>>>>>>>>> --with-pmi=/opt/slurm --with-fca=/opt/mellanox/fca 
>>>>>>>>>> --with-mxm=/opt/mellanox/mxm --with-hcoll=/opt/mellanox/hcoll' 
>>>>>>>>>> openmpi-1.8.5-1.src.rpm
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> gcc version 5.1.1
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> Thanks in advance
>>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>>>> users mailing list
>>>>>>>>>> us...@open-mpi.org
>>>>>>>>>> Subscription: http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/users
>>>>>>>>>> Link to this post: 
>>>>>>>>>> http://www.open-mpi.org/community/lists/users/2015/06/27154.php
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>>> users mailing list
>>>>>>>>> us...@open-mpi.org
>>>>>>>>> Subscription: http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/users
>>>>>>>>> Link to this post: 
>>>>>>>>> http://www.open-mpi.org/community/lists/users/2015/06/27155.php
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>> users mailing list
>>>>>>> us...@open-mpi.org
>>>>>>> Subscription: http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/users
>>>>>>> Link to this post: 
>>>>>>> http://www.open-mpi.org/community/lists/users/2015/06/27157.php
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> users mailing list
>>>>> us...@open-mpi.org
>>>>> Subscription: http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/users
>>>>> Link to this post: 
>>>>> http://www.open-mpi.org/community/lists/users/2015/06/27169.php
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> users mailing list
>>>> us...@open-mpi.org
>>>> Subscription: http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/users
>>>> Link to this post: 
>>>> http://www.open-mpi.org/community/lists/users/2015/06/27170.php
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> users mailing list
>>> us...@open-mpi.org
>>> Subscription: http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/users
>>> Link to this post: 
>>> http://www.open-mpi.org/community/lists/users/2015/06/27183.php
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> devel mailing list
>> de...@open-mpi.org
>> Subscription: http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/devel
>> Link to this post: 
>> http://www.open-mpi.org/community/lists/devel/2015/06/17528.php
> 
> _______________________________________________
> devel mailing list
> de...@open-mpi.org
> Subscription: http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/devel
> Link to this post: 
> http://www.open-mpi.org/community/lists/devel/2015/06/17529.php

Reply via email to