On Aug 26, 2015, at 11:29 AM, Ralph Castain <r...@open-mpi.org> wrote:
>
>> ...but only when the PSM MTL is not compiled directly into libmpi, e.g., via
>> using --disable-dlopen, or --enable-static (neither of which are the
>> default, but it's worth mentioning).
>
> Is that true? If the problem lies in not “nicely” handling the errhandler
> registrations, then so long as PSM is not selected, it shouldn’t have an
> impact.
That's what Gilles said. ...er, I guess he didn't state that directly; he said
that the signal handler is set when the DSO is dlopened, which I took to mean
that it occurs during a library constructor (and is therefore independent of
Open MPI selection):
http://www.open-mpi.org/community/lists/devel/2015/08/17857.php
I could be reading too much into Gilles' words, though...
I'll just shut up now and let Intel provide definitive answers to this issue.
:-)
--
Jeff Squyres
jsquy...@cisco.com
For corporate legal information go to:
http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/
