Ignore me; I read your email wrong.  You have "btl = ^usnic" commented out, and 
a line above it saying "if you need PSM2, then uncomment these...".

Makes perfect sense.  Sorry for the noise.


> On Sep 4, 2015, at 12:00 PM, Jeff Squyres (jsquyres) <jsquy...@cisco.com> 
> wrote:
> 
> Michael: Wait, why are you disabling usnic?
> 
> Please don't penalize usNIC because of Intel's PSM issues.
> 
> 
> 
>> On Sep 4, 2015, at 9:29 AM, Ralph Castain <r...@open-mpi.org> wrote:
>> 
>> Umm…why would USNIC depend on libpsm_infinipath?? Jeff or Dave - is that 
>> true?
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>> On Sep 4, 2015, at 5:57 AM, Michal Schmidt <mschm...@redhat.com> wrote:
>>> 
>>> On 09/03/2015 03:47 PM, Ralph Castain wrote:
>>>> I guess I didn’t make it clear in my prior comment, so let me try
>>>> again. I understand about dlopen and the fix that George proposed -
>>>> we had internally discussed this as well. However, the questions that
>>>> raises are:
>>>> 
>>>> 1. how does the distro (Michal) decide which PSM module to disable by
>>>> default in their package?
>>> 
>>> In the RHEL package I have disabled PSM2 by default in
>>> openmpi-mca-params.conf:
>>> 
>>> # Disable the psm2 MTL by default.
>>> # Workaround for https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1259835
>>> # This avoids a conflict between libpsm2.so.2 and libpsm_infinipath.so.1.
>>> mtl = ^psm2
>>> # If psm2 is needed, comment out the above line and uncomment
>>> # the following two lines. This will disable MCAs that are known to
>>> # depend on libpsm_infinipath.so.1:
>>> #   mtl = ^psm,ofi
>>> #   btl = ^usnic
>>> 
>>>> 2. how does the user “discover” that their fabric has automatically
>>>> been disabled, especially since this has never been the case before?
>>> 
>>> There will be a release note.
>>> OmniPath was not previously supported in RHEL at all, so it's not like
>>> I'm disabling something that used to work.
>>> 
>>> Regards,
>>> Michal
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> devel mailing list
>>> de...@open-mpi.org
>>> Subscription: http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/devel
>>> Link to this post: 
>>> http://www.open-mpi.org/community/lists/devel/2015/09/17965.php
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> devel mailing list
>> de...@open-mpi.org
>> Subscription: http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/devel
>> Link to this post: 
>> http://www.open-mpi.org/community/lists/devel/2015/09/17967.php
> 
> 
> -- 
> Jeff Squyres
> jsquy...@cisco.com
> For corporate legal information go to: 
> http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/
> 
> _______________________________________________
> devel mailing list
> de...@open-mpi.org
> Subscription: http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/devel
> Link to this post: 
> http://www.open-mpi.org/community/lists/devel/2015/09/17974.php


-- 
Jeff Squyres
jsquy...@cisco.com
For corporate legal information go to: 
http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/

Reply via email to