Great!! Can't reproduce the probem anymore on my laptop either!

Thanks Ralph!

Will test it on real systems once it hits master.

Cheers, Mark


> On 24 Oct 2015, at 6:08 , Ralph Castain <r...@open-mpi.org> wrote:
> 
> Thanks Mark!!
> 
> Your logs helped me track it down - a fix is in the oven:
> 
> https://github.com/open-mpi/ompi/pull/1067
> 
> Once that completes, I’ll schedule it for 1.10.1 and 2.0. If you get a 
> chance, please give it a try and let me know how it works for you. It passed 
> your provided reproducer with flying colors.
> 
> Ralph
> 
>> On Oct 23, 2015, at 5:40 PM, Ralph Castain <r...@open-mpi.org> wrote:
>> 
>> Could be - let me investigate this weekend.
>> 
>> Thanks for all that parsing!!!
>> 
>>> On Oct 23, 2015, at 5:00 PM, Mark Santcroos <mark.santcr...@rutgers.edu> 
>>> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Is this the culprit?
>>> 
>>> 'ACTIVATING PROC [[8679,2],0] STATE IOF COMPLETE PRI 4',
>>> 'state:base:track_procs called for proc [[8679,2],0] state RUNNING',
>>> 
>>> That seems to be out of order for the hanging processes.
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> devel mailing list
>>> de...@open-mpi.org
>>> Subscription: http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/devel
>>> Link to this post: 
>>> http://www.open-mpi.org/community/lists/devel/2015/10/18263.php
>> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> devel mailing list
> de...@open-mpi.org
> Subscription: http://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/devel
> Link to this post: 
> http://www.open-mpi.org/community/lists/devel/2015/10/18265.php

Reply via email to