Ralph,

Not there yet. I got similar deadlocks, but the stack not looks slightly
different. I only have 1 single thread doing something useful (aka being in
listen_thread_fn), every other thread is having a similar stack:

  * frame #0: 0x00007fff93306de6 libsystem_kernel.dylib`__psynch_mutexwait
+ 10
    frame #1: 0x00007fff9a000e4a
libsystem_pthread.dylib`_pthread_mutex_lock_wait + 89
    frame #2: 0x00007fff99ffe5f5
libsystem_pthread.dylib`_pthread_mutex_lock_slow + 300
    frame #3: 0x00007fff8c2a00f8 libdyld.dylib`dyldGlobalLockAcquire() + 16
    frame #4: 0x00007fff6bbc3177
dyld`ImageLoaderMachOCompressed::doBindFastLazySymbol(unsigned int,
ImageLoader::LinkContext const&, void (*)(), void (*)()) + 55
    frame #5: 0x00007fff6bbad063
dyld`dyld::fastBindLazySymbol(ImageLoader**, unsigned long) + 90
    frame #6: 0x00007fff8c2a0262 libdyld.dylib`dyld_stub_binder + 282
    frame #7: 0x00000001019d39b0 libopen-pal.0.dylib`obj_order_type + 3776

  George.


On Mon, Jun 6, 2016 at 1:41 PM, Ralph Castain <r...@open-mpi.org> wrote:

> I think I have this fixed here: https://github.com/open-mpi/ompi/pull/1756
>
> George - can you please try it on your system?
>
>
> On Jun 5, 2016, at 4:18 PM, Ralph Castain <r...@open-mpi.org> wrote:
>
> Yeah, I can reproduce on my box. What is happening is that we aren’t
> properly protected during finalize, and so we tear down some component that
> is registered for a callback, and then the callback occurs. So we just need
> to ensure that we finalize in the right order
>
> On Jun 5, 2016, at 3:51 PM, Jeff Squyres (jsquyres) <jsquy...@cisco.com>
> wrote:
>
> Ok, good.
>
> FWIW: I tried all Friday afternoon to reproduce on my OS X laptop (i.e., I
> did something like George's shell script loop), and just now I ran George's
> exact loop, but I haven't been able to reproduce.  In this case, I'm
> falling on the wrong side of whatever race condition is happening...
>
>
> On Jun 4, 2016, at 7:57 PM, Ralph Castain <r...@open-mpi.org> wrote:
>
> I may have an idea of what’s going on here - I just need to finish
> something else first and then I’ll take a look.
>
>
> On Jun 4, 2016, at 4:20 PM, George Bosilca <bosi...@icl.utk.edu> wrote:
>
>
> On Jun 5, 2016, at 07:53 , Ralph Castain <r...@open-mpi.org> wrote:
>
>
> On Jun 4, 2016, at 1:11 PM, George Bosilca <bosi...@icl.utk.edu> wrote:
>
>
>
> On Sat, Jun 4, 2016 at 11:05 PM, Ralph Castain <r...@open-mpi.org> wrote:
> He can try adding "-mca state_base_verbose 5”, but if we are failing to
> catch sigchld, I’m not sure what debugging info is going to help resolve
> that problem. These aren’t even fast-running apps, so there was plenty of
> time to register for the signal prior to termination.
>
> I vaguely recollect that we have occasionally seen this on Mac before and
> it had something to do with oddness in sigchld handling…
>
> Assuming sigchld has some oddness on OSX. Why is then mpirun deadlocking
> instead of quitting which will then allow the OS to clean all children?
>
>
> I don’t think mpirun is actually “deadlocked” - I think it may just be
> waiting for sigchld to tell it that the local processes have terminated.
>
> However, that wouldn't explain why you see what looks like libraries being
> unloaded. That implies mpirun is actually finalizing, but failing to fully
> exit - which would indeed be more of a deadlock.
>
> So the question is: are you truly seeing us missing sigchld (as was
> suggested earlier in this thread),
>
>
> In theory the processes remains in zombie state until the parent calls
> waitpid on them, at which moment they are supposed to disappear. Based on
> this, as the processes are still in zombie state, I assumed that mpirun was
> not calling waitpid. One could also assume we are again hit by the fork
> race condition we had a while back, but as all local processes are in
> zombie mode, this is hardly believable.
>
> or did mpirun correctly see all the child processes terminate and is
> actually hanging while trying to exit (as was also suggested earlier)?
>
>
> One way or another the stack of the main thread looks busted. While the
> discussion about this was going on I was able to replicate the bug with
> only ORTE involved. Simply running
>
> for i in `seq 1 1 1000`; do echo “$i"; mpirun -np 4 hostname; done
>
> ‘deadlock’ or whatever name we want to call this reliably before hitting
> the 300 iteration. Unfortunately adding the verbose option alter the
> behavior enough that the issue does not reproduce.
>
> George.
>
>
> Adding the state verbosity should tell us which of those two is true,
> assuming it doesn’t affect the timing so much that everything works :-/
>
>
>
> George.
>
>
>
>
> On Jun 4, 2016, at 7:01 AM, Jeff Squyres (jsquyres) <jsquy...@cisco.com>
> wrote:
>
> Meh.  Ok.  Should George run with some verbose level to get more info?
>
> On Jun 4, 2016, at 6:43 AM, Ralph Castain <r...@open-mpi.org> wrote:
>
> Neither of those threads have anything to do with catching the sigchld -
> threads 4-5 are listening for OOB and PMIx connection requests. It looks
> more like mpirun thought it had picked everything up and has begun shutting
> down, but I can’t really tell for certain.
>
> On Jun 4, 2016, at 6:29 AM, Jeff Squyres (jsquyres) <jsquy...@cisco.com>
> wrote:
>
> On Jun 3, 2016, at 11:07 PM, George Bosilca <bosi...@icl.utk.edu> wrote:
>
>
> After finalize. As I said in my original email I se all the output the
> application is generating, and all processes (which are local as this
> happens on my laptop) are in zombie mode (Z+). This basically means whoever
> was supposed to get the SIGCHLD, didn't do it's job of cleaning them up.
>
>
> Ah -- so perhaps threads 1,2,3 are red herrings: the real problem here is
> that the parent didn't catch the child exits (which presumably should have
> been caught in threads 4 or 5).
>
> Ralph: is there any state from threads 4 or 5 that would be helpful to
> examine to see if they somehow missed catching children exits?
>
> --
> Jeff Squyres
> jsquy...@cisco.com
> For corporate legal information go to:
> http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/
>
> _______________________________________________
> devel mailing list
> de...@open-mpi.org
> Subscription: https://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/devel
> Link to this post:
> http://www.open-mpi.org/community/lists/devel/2016/06/19070.php
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> devel mailing list
> de...@open-mpi.org
> Subscription: https://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/devel
> Link to this post:
> http://www.open-mpi.org/community/lists/devel/2016/06/19071.php
>
>
>
> --
> Jeff Squyres
> jsquy...@cisco.com
> For corporate legal information go to:
> http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/
>
> _______________________________________________
> devel mailing list
> de...@open-mpi.org
> Subscription: https://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/devel
> Link to this post:
> http://www.open-mpi.org/community/lists/devel/2016/06/19072.php
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> devel mailing list
> de...@open-mpi.org
> Subscription: https://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/devel
> Link to this post:
> http://www.open-mpi.org/community/lists/devel/2016/06/19073.php
>
> _______________________________________________
> devel mailing list
> de...@open-mpi.org
> Subscription: https://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/devel
> Link to this post:
> http://www.open-mpi.org/community/lists/devel/2016/06/19074.php
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> devel mailing list
> de...@open-mpi.org
> Subscription: https://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/devel
> Link to this post:
> http://www.open-mpi.org/community/lists/devel/2016/06/19075.php
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> devel mailing list
> de...@open-mpi.org
> Subscription: https://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/devel
> Link to this post:
> http://www.open-mpi.org/community/lists/devel/2016/06/19076.php
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> devel mailing list
> de...@open-mpi.org
> Subscription: https://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/devel
> Link to this post:
> http://www.open-mpi.org/community/lists/devel/2016/06/19077.php
>
>
>
> --
> Jeff Squyres
> jsquy...@cisco.com
> For corporate legal information go to:
> http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/
>
> _______________________________________________
> devel mailing list
> de...@open-mpi.org
> Subscription: https://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/devel
> Link to this post:
> http://www.open-mpi.org/community/lists/devel/2016/06/19078.php
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> devel mailing list
> de...@open-mpi.org
> Subscription: https://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/devel
> Link to this post:
> http://www.open-mpi.org/community/lists/devel/2016/06/19080.php
>

Reply via email to