Thanks George, i will try to find it.
for the second part, and if i read between the lines, that means a
collective operation cannot have non deterministic paths, such as
for (...) MPI_Irecv();
for (...) { MPI_Waitany(); ompi_op_reduce(); }
is that *really* prohibited ? i thought it was "only" *strongly
discouraged* ...
Cheers,
Gilles
On 6/10/2016 5:10 PM, George Bosilca wrote:
There is a mechanism to select the collective algorithm upon
communicator creation. It is not using MPI_T (as this mechanism didn't
exist at the tuned conception), but it behave in a similar manner. You
simply update an MCA param (I do not remember the name and I'm not
close to my computer), and the next communicator creation will
automatically adapt its behavior.
That being said it would be illegal in MQPI lingo to change the
collective algorithm on an existing comomunicator, especially for
reduction operations. It is clearly specified that if you execute
multiple times a collective between the same processes with the same
values and in the context of the same run you should get the exact
same result.
George.
On Friday, June 10, 2016, Gilles Gouaillardet <gil...@rist.or.jp
<mailto:gil...@rist.or.jp>> wrote:
Folks,
i was thinking of using the MPI_T interface in order to try within
the same MPI test program *all* the available algo of a given
collective.
That cannot currently be done because the mca parameter is
registered with
{flag=0, scope=MCA_BASE_VAR_SCOPE_READONLY}
i made a proof of concept by changing this to
{flag=MCA_BASE_VAR_FLAG_SETTABLE, scope=MCA_VAR_SCOPE_ALL}
(see the inline patch below)
strictly speaking, it does not work since the updated values are
used next time a communicator is created.
for example, changing a value on MPI_COMM_WORLD has no effect,
but changing a value, MPI_Comm_dup(MPI_COMM_WORLD) and using the
dup'ed communicator works.
btw, i guess any communicator could be used to set the value.
as far as i am concerned, that is good enough for me
any objections to make some coll/tuned parameters writable by MPI_T ?
if no, did i implement it correctly ?
Cheers,
Gilles
here is the function that sets a value :
int setValue_int_comm(int index, MPI_Comm comm, int *val) {
int err,count;
MPI_T_cvar_handle handle;
/* This example assumes that the variable index */
/* can be bound to a communicator */
err=MPI_T_cvar_handle_alloc(index,&comm,&handle,&count);
if (err!=MPI_SUCCESS) return err;
/* The following assumes that the variable is */
/* represented by a single integer */
err=MPI_T_cvar_write(handle,val);
if (err!=MPI_SUCCESS) return err;
err=MPI_T_cvar_handle_free(&handle);
return err;
}
and here is the proof of concept
diff --git a/ompi/mca/coll/tuned/coll_tuned_bcast_decision.c
b/ompi/mca/coll/tuned/coll_tuned_bcast_decision.c
index 81345b2..31ca217 100644
--- a/ompi/mca/coll/tuned/coll_tuned_bcast_decision.c
+++ b/ompi/mca/coll/tuned/coll_tuned_bcast_decision.c
@@ -76,9 +76,9 @@ int
ompi_coll_tuned_bcast_intra_check_forced_init
(coll_tuned_force_algorithm_mc
mca_base_component_var_register(&mca_coll_tuned_component.super.collm_version,
"bcast_algorithm",
"Which bcast algorithm is
used. Can be locked down to choice of: 0 ignore, 1 basic linear, 2
chain, 3: pipeline, 4: split binary tree, 5: binary tree, 6:
binomial tree.",
- MCA_BASE_VAR_TYPE_INT, new_enum, 0, 0,
+ MCA_BASE_VAR_TYPE_INT, new_enum, 0, MCA_BASE_VAR_FLAG_SETTABLE,
OPAL_INFO_LVL_5,
- MCA_BASE_VAR_SCOPE_READONLY,
+ MCA_BASE_VAR_SCOPE_ALL,
&coll_tuned_bcast_forced_algorithm);
OBJ_RELEASE(new_enum);
if (mca_param_indices->algorithm_param_index < 0) {
diff --git a/ompi/mca/coll/tuned/coll_tuned_component.c
b/ompi/mca/coll/tuned/coll_tuned_component.c
index 9756359..ea389fd 100644
--- a/ompi/mca/coll/tuned/coll_tuned_component.c
+++ b/ompi/mca/coll/tuned/coll_tuned_component.c
@@ -164,9 +164,9 @@ static int tuned_register(void)
(void)
mca_base_component_var_register(&mca_coll_tuned_component.super.collm_version,
"use_dynamic_rules",
"Switch used to decide
if we use static (compiled/if statements) or dynamic (built at
runtime) decision function rules",
- MCA_BASE_VAR_TYPE_BOOL, NULL, 0, 0,
+ MCA_BASE_VAR_TYPE_BOOL, NULL, 0, MCA_BASE_VAR_FLAG_SETTABLE,
OPAL_INFO_LVL_6,
- MCA_BASE_VAR_SCOPE_READONLY,
+ MCA_BASE_VAR_SCOPE_ALL,
&ompi_coll_tuned_use_dynamic_rules);
ompi_coll_tuned_dynamic_rules_filename = NULL;
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
de...@open-mpi.org
Subscription: https://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/devel
Link to this post:
http://www.open-mpi.org/community/lists/devel/2016/06/19094.php
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
de...@open-mpi.org
Subscription: https://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/devel
Link to this post:
http://www.open-mpi.org/community/lists/devel/2016/06/19095.php
NT, new_enum, 0,
MCA_BASE_VAR_FLAG_SETTABLE,<br>
OPAL_INFO_LVL_5,<br>
- MCA_BASE_VAR_SCOPE_READONLY,<br>
+
MCA_BASE_VAR_SCOPE_ALL,<br>
&coll_tuned_bcast_forced_algorithm);<br>
OBJ_RELEASE(new_enum);<br>
if (mca_param_indices->algorithm_param_index < 0)
{<br>
diff --git a/ompi/mca/coll/tuned/coll_tuned_component.c
b/ompi/mca/coll/tuned/coll_tuned_component.c<br>
index 9756359..ea389fd 100644<br>
--- a/ompi/mca/coll/tuned/coll_tuned_component.c<br>
+++ b/ompi/mca/coll/tuned/coll_tuned_component.c<br>
@@ -164,9 +164,9 @@ static int tuned_register(void)<br>
(void)
mca_base_component_var_register(&mca_coll_tuned_component.super.collm_version,<br>
"use_dynamic_rules",<br>
"Switch used to
decide if we use static (compiled/if statements) or dynamic
(built at runtime) decision function rules",<br>
- MCA_BASE_VAR_TYPE_BOOL, NULL, 0, 0,<br>
+ MCA_BASE_VAR_TYPE_BOOL, NULL, 0,
MCA_BASE_VAR_FLAG_SETTABLE,<br>
OPAL_INFO_LVL_6,<br>
- MCA_BASE_VAR_SCOPE_READONLY,<br>
+ MCA_BASE_VAR_SCOPE_ALL,<br>
&ompi_coll_tuned_use_dynamic_rules);<br>
<br>
ompi_coll_tuned_dynamic_rules_filename = NULL;<br>
<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
devel mailing list<br>
<a moz-do-not-send="true">de...@open-mpi.org</a><br>
Subscription: <a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="https://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/devel";
target="_blank">https://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/devel</a><br>
Link to this post: <a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="http://www.open-mpi.org/community/lists/devel/2016/06/19094.php";
target="_blank">http://www.open-mpi.org/community/lists/devel/2016/06/19094.php</a><br>
</blockquote>
</div>
</div>
<br>
<fieldset class="mimeAttachmentHeader"></fieldset>
<br>
<pre wrap="">_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
de...@open-mpi.org
Subscription: https://www.open-mpi.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/devel
Link to this post:
http://www.open-mpi.org/community/lists/devel/2016/06/19095.php</pre>
</blockquote>
<br>
</body>
</html>
