Ok,
one test segfaulted *but* I can't tell if it is the *same* bug because
there has been a segfault:
stderr:
http://www.giref.ulaval.ca/~cmpgiref/dernier_ompi/2016.09.14.10h38m52s.faultyCerr.Triangle.h_cte_1.txt
[lorien:190552] [[INVALID],INVALID] plm:rsh_lookup on agent ssh : rsh
path NULL
[lorien:190552] plm:base:set_hnp_name: initial bias 190552 nodename hash
1366255883
[lorien:190552] plm:base:set_hnp_name: final jobfam 53310
[lorien:190552] [[53310,0],0] plm:rsh_setup on agent ssh : rsh path NULL
[lorien:190552] [[53310,0],0] plm:base:receive start comm
*** Error in `orted': realloc(): invalid next size: 0x0000000001e58770 ***
...
...
[lorien:190306] [[INVALID],INVALID] ORTE_ERROR_LOG: Unable to start a
daemon on the local node in file ess_singleton_module.c at line 573
[lorien:190306] [[INVALID],INVALID] ORTE_ERROR_LOG: Unable to start a
daemon on the local node in file ess_singleton_module.c at line 163
*** An error occurred in MPI_Init_thread
*** on a NULL communicator
*** MPI_ERRORS_ARE_FATAL (processes in this communicator will now abort,
*** and potentially your MPI job)
[lorien:190306] Local abort before MPI_INIT completed completed
successfully, but am not able to aggregate error messages, and not able
to guarantee that all other processes were killed!
stdout:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
It looks like orte_init failed for some reason; your parallel process is
likely to abort. There are many reasons that a parallel process can
fail during orte_init; some of which are due to configuration or
environment problems. This failure appears to be an internal failure;
here's some additional information (which may only be relevant to an
Open MPI developer):
orte_ess_init failed
--> Returned value Unable to start a daemon on the local node (-127)
instead of ORTE_SUCCESS
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
It looks like MPI_INIT failed for some reason; your parallel process is
likely to abort. There are many reasons that a parallel process can
fail during MPI_INIT; some of which are due to configuration or environment
problems. This failure appears to be an internal failure; here's some
additional information (which may only be relevant to an Open MPI
developer):
ompi_mpi_init: ompi_rte_init failed
--> Returned "Unable to start a daemon on the local node" (-127)
instead of "Success" (0)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
openmpi content of $TMP:
/tmp/tmp.GoQXICeyJl> ls -la
total 1500
drwx------ 3 cmpbib bib 250 Sep 14 13:34 .
drwxrwxrwt 356 root root 61440 Sep 14 13:45 ..
...
drwx------ 1848 cmpbib bib 45056 Sep 14 13:34
openmpi-sessions-40031@lorien_0
srw-rw-r-- 1 cmpbib bib 0 Sep 14 12:24 pmix-190552
cmpbib@lorien:/tmp/tmp.GoQXICeyJl/openmpi-sessions-40031@lorien_0> find
. -type f
./53310/contact.txt
cat 53310/contact.txt
3493724160.0;usock;tcp://132.203.7.36:54605
190552
egrep 'jobfam|stop' */*/Cerr* ../BIBTV/*/*/*/Cerr*|grep 53310
dev/Test.FonctionsSUPG/Cerr.Triangle.h_cte_1.txt:[lorien:190552]
plm:base:set_hnp_name: final jobfam 53310
(this is the faulty test)
full egrep:
http://www.giref.ulaval.ca/~cmpgiref/dernier_ompi/2016.09.14.10h38m52s.egrep.txt
config.log:
http://www.giref.ulaval.ca/~cmpgiref/dernier_ompi/2016.09.14.10h38m52s_config.log
ompi_info:
http://www.giref.ulaval.ca/~cmpgiref/dernier_ompi/2016.09.14.10h38m52s_ompi_info_all.txt
Maybe it aborted (instead of giving the other message) while doing the
error because of export OMPI_MCA_plm_base_verbose=5 ?
Thanks,
Eric
On 14/09/16 10:27 AM, Gilles Gouaillardet wrote:
Eric,
do you mean you have a unique $TMP per a.out ?
or a unique $TMP per "batch" of run ?
in the first case, my understanding is that conflicts cannot happen ...
once you hit the bug, can you please please post the output of the
failed a.out,
and run
egrep 'jobfam|stop'
on all your logs, so we might spot a conflict
Cheers,
Gilles
On Wednesday, September 14, 2016, Eric Chamberland
<eric.chamberl...@giref.ulaval.ca
<mailto:eric.chamberl...@giref.ulaval.ca>> wrote:
Lucky!
Since each runs have a specific TMP, I still have it on disc.
for the faulty run, the TMP variable was:
TMP=/tmp/tmp.wOv5dkNaSI
and into $TMP I have:
openmpi-sessions-40031@lorien_0
and into this subdirectory I have a bunch of empty dirs:
cmpbib@lorien:/tmp/tmp.wOv5dkNaSI/openmpi-sessions-40031@lorien_0>
ls -la |wc -l
1841
cmpbib@lorien:/tmp/tmp.wOv5dkNaSI/openmpi-sessions-40031@lorien_0>
ls -la |more
total 68
drwx------ 1840 cmpbib bib 45056 Sep 13 03:49 .
drwx------ 3 cmpbib bib 231 Sep 13 03:50 ..
drwx------ 2 cmpbib bib 6 Sep 13 02:10 10015
drwx------ 2 cmpbib bib 6 Sep 13 03:05 10049
drwx------ 2 cmpbib bib 6 Sep 13 03:15 10052
drwx------ 2 cmpbib bib 6 Sep 13 02:22 10059
drwx------ 2 cmpbib bib 6 Sep 13 02:22 10110
drwx------ 2 cmpbib bib 6 Sep 13 02:41 10114
...
If I do:
lsof |grep "openmpi-sessions-40031"
lsof: WARNING: can't stat() fuse.gvfsd-fuse file system
/run/user/1000/gvfs
Output information may be incomplete.
lsof: WARNING: can't stat() tracefs file system
/sys/kernel/debug/tracing
Output information may be incomplete.
nothing...
What else may I check?
Eric
On 14/09/16 08:47 AM, Joshua Ladd wrote:
Hi, Eric
I **think** this might be related to the following:
https://github.com/pmix/master/pull/145
<https://github.com/pmix/master/pull/145>
I'm wondering if you can look into the /tmp directory and see if you
have a bunch of stale usock files.
Best,
Josh
On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 1:36 AM, Gilles Gouaillardet
<gil...@rist.or.jp
<mailto:gil...@rist.or.jp>> wrote:
Eric,
can you please provide more information on how your tests
are launched ?
do you
mpirun -np 1 ./a.out
or do you simply
./a.out
do you use a batch manager ? if yes, which one ?
do you run one test per job ? or multiple tests per job ?
how are these tests launched ?
do the test that crashes use MPI_Comm_spawn ?
i am surprised by the process name [[9325,5754],0], which
suggests
there MPI_Comm_spawn was called 5753 times (!)
can you also run
hostname
on the 'lorien' host ?
if you configure'd Open MPI with --enable-debug, can you
export OMPI_MCA_plm_base_verbose 5
then run one test and post the logs ?
from orte_plm_base_set_hnp_name(), "lorien" and pid 142766
should
produce job family 5576 (but you get 9325)
the discrepancy could be explained by the use of a batch manager
and/or a full hostname i am unaware of.
orte_plm_base_set_hnp_name() generate a 16 bits job family
from the
(32 bits hash of the) hostname and the mpirun (32 bits ?) pid.
so strictly speaking, it is possible two jobs launched on
the same
node are assigned the same 16 bits job family.
the easiest way to detect this could be to
- edit orte/mca/plm/base/plm_base_jobid.c
and replace
OPAL_OUTPUT_VERBOSE((5,
orte_plm_base_framework.framework_output,
"plm:base:set_hnp_name: final
jobfam %lu",
(unsigned long)jobfam));
with
OPAL_OUTPUT_VERBOSE((4,
orte_plm_base_framework.framework_output,
"plm:base:set_hnp_name: final
jobfam %lu",
(unsigned long)jobfam));
configure Open MPI with --enable-debug and rebuild
and then
export OMPI_MCA_plm_base_verbose=4
and run your tests.
when the problem occurs, you will be able to check which pids
produced the faulty jobfam, and that could hint to a conflict.
Cheers,
Gilles
On 9/14/2016 12:35 AM, Eric Chamberland wrote:
Hi,
It is the third time this happened into the last 10 days.
While running nighlty tests (~2200), we have one or two
tests
that fails at the very beginning with this strange error:
[lorien:142766] [[9325,5754],0] usock_peer_recv_connect_ack:
received unexpected process identifier [[9325,0],0] from
[[5590,0],0]
But I can't reproduce the problem right now... ie: If I
launch
this test alone "by hand", it is successful... the same
test was
successful yesterday...
Is there some kind of "race condition" that can happen
on the
creation of "tmp" files if many tests runs together on
the same
node? (we are oversubcribing even sequential runs...)
Here are the build logs:
http://www.giref.ulaval.ca/~cmpgiref/dernier_ompi/2016.09.13.01h16m01s_config.log
<http://www.giref.ulaval.ca/~cmpgiref/dernier_ompi/2016.09.13.01h16m01s_config.log>
<http://www.giref.ulaval.ca/~cmpgiref/dernier_ompi/2016.09.13.01h16m01s_config.log
<http://www.giref.ulaval.ca/~cmpgiref/dernier_ompi/2016.09.13.01h16m01s_config.log>>
http://www.giref.ulaval.ca/~cmpgiref/dernier_ompi/2016.09.13.01h16m01s_ompi_info_all.txt
<http://www.giref.ulaval.ca/~cmpgiref/dernier_ompi/2016.09.13.01h16m01s_ompi_info_all.txt>
<http://www.giref.ulaval.ca/~cmpgiref/dernier_ompi/2016.09.13.01h16m01s_ompi_info_all.txt
<http://www.giref.ulaval.ca/~cmpgiref/dernier_ompi/2016.09.13.01h16m01s_ompi_info_all.txt>>
Thanks,
Eric
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
devel@lists.open-mpi.org <mailto:devel@lists.open-mpi.org>
https://rfd.newmexicoconsortium.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
<https://rfd.newmexicoconsortium.org/mailman/listinfo/devel>
<https://rfd.newmexicoconsortium.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
<https://rfd.newmexicoconsortium.org/mailman/listinfo/devel>>
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
devel@lists.open-mpi.org <mailto:devel@lists.open-mpi.org>
https://rfd.newmexicoconsortium.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
<https://rfd.newmexicoconsortium.org/mailman/listinfo/devel>
<https://rfd.newmexicoconsortium.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
<https://rfd.newmexicoconsortium.org/mailman/listinfo/devel>>
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
devel@lists.open-mpi.org
https://rfd.newmexicoconsortium.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
<https://rfd.newmexicoconsortium.org/mailman/listinfo/devel>
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
devel@lists.open-mpi.org
https://rfd.newmexicoconsortium.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
