Ralph,

in v1.10 series, BTL is still in the OMPI layer.

from v2, could the BTL directly use PMIx instead of rml (orte) ?

Cheers,

Gilles

On Thursday, April 20, 2017, [email protected] <[email protected]> wrote:

> Hi Shiqing!
>
> Been a long time - hope you are doing well.
>
> I see no way to bring the oob module back now that the BTLs are in the
> OPAL layer - this is why it was removed as the oob is in ORTE, and thus not
> accessible from OPAL.
> Ralph
>
> On Apr 20, 2017, at 6:02 AM, Shiqing Fan <[email protected]
> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','[email protected]');>> wrote:
>
> Dear all,
>
> I noticed that openib oob module has been removed since a long time ago,
> because it wasn’t working anymore and nobody seemed need it.
> But for some special operating system, where the rdmacm, udcm or ibcm
> kernel support is missing, oob may still be necessary.
>
> I’m curious if it’s possible to bring this module back? How difficult
> would it be to fix the bug in order to make it work again in 1.10 branch or
> later? Thanks a lot.
>
> Best Regards,
> Shiqing
> _______________________________________________
> devel mailing list
> [email protected]
> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','[email protected]');>
> https://rfd.newmexicoconsortium.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
>
>
>
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://rfd.newmexicoconsortium.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Reply via email to