Hi Marco
Try the patch here (for the prrte 3rd-party subdirectory):
https://github.com/openpmix/prrte/pull/1173
Ralph
> On Jan 9, 2022, at 12:29 AM, Marco Atzeri via devel
> <devel@lists.open-mpi.org> wrote:
>
> On 01.01.2022 20:07, Barrett, Brian wrote:
>> Marco -
>> There are some patches that haven't made it to the 5.0 branch to make this
>> behavior better. I didn't get a chance to back port them before the holiday
>> break, but they will be in the next RC. That said, the issue below is a
>> warning, not an error, so you should still end up with a build that works
>> (with an included PMIx). The issue is that png-config can't be found, so we
>> have trouble guessing what libraries are dependencies of PMIx, which is a
>> potential problem in complicated builds with static libraries.
>> Brian
>
> Thanks Brian,
>
> the build error was in reality in setting for threads.
>
> I was using up to v4.1
>
> --with-threads=posix
>
> that currently is not accepted anymore but no error is reported,
> causing a different setting that does not work in CYGWIN.
> Removing the configuration seems to work
>
>
> I have however found a logic error in prrte that
> probably need a verification of all the HAVE_*_H
> between configuration and code
>
>
> /pub/devel/openmpi/v5.0/openmpi-5.0.0-0.1.x86_64/src/openmpi-5.0.0rc2/3rd-party/prrte/src/mca/odls/default/odls_default_module.c:114:14:
> fatal error: sys/ptrace.h: No such file or directory
> 114 | # include <sys/ptrace.h>
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>
> caused by
>
> $ grep -rH HAVE_SYS_PTRACE_H .
> ./3rd-party/prrte/config.log:| #define HAVE_SYS_PTRACE_H 0
> ./3rd-party/prrte/config.log:| #define HAVE_SYS_PTRACE_H 0
> ./3rd-party/prrte/config.log:#define HAVE_SYS_PTRACE_H 0
> ./3rd-party/prrte/config.status:D["HAVE_SYS_PTRACE_H"]=" 0"
> ./3rd-party/prrte/src/include/prte_config.h:#define HAVE_SYS_PTRACE_H 0
>
> while the code in
> 3rd-party/prrte/src/mca/odls/default/odls_default_module.c
> has
>
> #ifdef HAVE_SYS_PTRACE_H
> # include <sys/ptrace.h>
> #endif
>
>
> currently I am stacked at
>
> 0rc2/3rd-party/prrte/src/mca/oob/tcp/oob_tcp_connection.c:61:
> /pub/devel/openmpi/v5.0/openmpi-5.0.0-0.1.x86_64/src/openmpi-5.0.0rc2/3rd-party/prrte/s
> rc/mca/oob/tcp/oob_tcp_connection.c: In function
> ‘prte_oob_tcp_peer_try_connect’:
> /pub/devel/openmpi/v5.0/openmpi-5.0.0-0.1.x86_64/src/openmpi-5.0.0rc2/3rd-party/prrte/src/mca/oob/tcp/oob_tcp_connection.c:163:16:
> error: expected identifier or ‘(’ before ‘struct’
> 163 | prte_if_t *interface;
> | ^~~~~~~~~
> /pub/devel/openmpi/v5.0/openmpi-5.0.0-0.1.x86_64/src/openmpi-5.0.0rc2/3rd-party/prrte/src/mca/oob/tcp/oob_tcp_connection.c:180:19:
> error: expected ‘{’ before ‘=’ token
> 180 | interface = PRTE_NEW(prte_if_t);
> | ^
>
>
> not sure if it is caused by new GCC 11 requirement or from wrong headers
> being pulled in.
>
> Has anyone built with GCC 11 ?
>
> Regards
> Marco
>
