LANL would be interested in supporting this feature as well. Howard
On Mon, Aug 28, 2023 at 9:58 AM Jeff Squyres (jsquyres) via devel < devel@lists.open-mpi.org> wrote: > We got a presentation from the ABI WG (proxied via Quincey from AWS) a few > months ago. > > The proposal looked reasonable. > > No one has signed up to do the work yet, but based on what we saw in that > presentation, the general consensus was "sure, we could probably get on > board with that." > > There's definitely going to be issues to be worked out (e.g., are we going > to break Open MPI ABI? Maybe offer 2 flavors of ABI? Is this a > configure-time option, or do we build "both" ways? ...etc.), but it > sounded like the community members who heard this proposal were generally > in favor of moving in this direction. > ------------------------------ > *From:* devel <devel-boun...@lists.open-mpi.org> on behalf of Gilles > Gouaillardet via devel <devel@lists.open-mpi.org> > *Sent:* Saturday, August 26, 2023 2:20 AM > *To:* Open MPI Developers <devel@lists.open-mpi.org> > *Cc:* Gilles Gouaillardet <gilles.gouaillar...@gmail.com> > *Subject:* [OMPI devel] MPI ABI effort > > Folks, > > Jeff Hammond and al. published "MPI Application Binary Interface > Standardization" las week > https://arxiv.org/abs/2308.11214 > > The paper reads the (C) ABI has already been prototyped natively in MPICH. > > Is there any current interest into prototyping this ABI into Open MPI? > > > Cheers, > > Gilles >
