On Mon, Jan 4, 2010 at 6:07 PM, Julien Kerihuel <[email protected]> wrote: > On Mon, 2010-01-04 at 13:23 +0530, Girish V wrote: >> rpc_server/dcerpc_server.c:66: Failed to find assoc_group 0x0002e668 >> Terminating connection - 'NT_STATUS_CONNECTION_DISCONNECTED' >> single_terminate: reason[NT_STATUS_CONNECTION_DISCONNECTED] >> >> >> There is no firewall in between. >> >> This had been working from my recollection a long time ago(some 4 months >> past). >> >> What changed? > > Hi Girish, > > Samba4 introduced an improved a better way to support dcerpc association > group. I have indeed brought related changes to the OpenChange Proxy, > but have next extensively been testing it before we ship 0.9 release. > > What does /usr/local/samba/include/samba/version.h shows? (It is > expected to have either samba4-alpha9 or samba4-alpha10)
Julien, If it has not been tested then surely something is wrong somewhere. I am not in favor of running an older version as suggested by Brad. There are talloc incompatibility issues and it is quite a headache. I just now banged into a samba compile failure. I would rather that we get this working in the latest release. Contents of /usr/local/samba/include/samba/version.h /* Autogenerated by script/mkversion.sh */ #define SAMBA_VERSION_MAJOR 4 #define SAMBA_VERSION_MINOR 0 #define SAMBA_VERSION_RELEASE 0 #define SAMBA_VERSION_ALPHA_RELEASE 10 #define SAMBA_VERSION_OFFICIAL_STRING "4.0.0alpha10" /* Version for mkrelease.sh: SAMBA_VERSION_STRING=4.0.0alpha10 */ #define SAMBA_VERSION_STRING "4.0.0alpha10" Can you please see what is up and fix stuff? I am stuck very badly and without a working proxy I find it very hard to proceed. It is very critical for what I am doing. Thanks. -Girish _______________________________________________ devel mailing list [email protected] http://mailman.openchange.org/listinfo/devel
