On Wed, 7 Dec 2011 07:41:46 PM Milan Crha wrote: > Anyway, OK, let's keep there mapi_SPropValue and SPropValue structs, but > join mapi_SPropValue_CTR and SPropValue_CTR into one structure seems to > me as a good step, feel free to call it a cleanup. I see that MSDN > doesn't distinguish between these two [1], though they have it done > slightly differently with compare to OpenChange. (Some values are > probably stored as PT_PTR, to avoid circular dependencies, seems to me). This isn't as simple as it might look. IIRC, there are differences to work- around limitations in what PIDL can handle. That is, these differences are used to handle the serialization from the wire.
Brad _______________________________________________ devel mailing list [email protected] http://mailman.openchange.org/listinfo/devel
