-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Somebody in the thread at some point said:
|> That may be, but despite that I need a daily package for kernel I can |> point people to. Actually blocking current stable kernel from users by |> not packaging it, which seems to be the case, is completely backwards. | | point them to unstable, it will build the latest stable version every day[1]. | | z. | | | [1] At least this is the plan Currently there is no source of packages anywhere for nearly a couple of weeks. It makes sense to me if our kernel stable git doesn't go straight to distribution stable repo for QA. But without a tracking package somewhere, it won't get user testing that is needed to make a QA action work. So "unstable" will be fine if it is fixed to actually tracks us. One thing though, I did not read about this and since I spend time working with end users and advising them I needed to know. Did I miss a notificaton? - -Andy -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEARECAAYFAkjaffcACgkQOjLpvpq7dMrLowCePBN5mFiB5uLa4EJuDLFXFfJP yj8AnjYMYgwbVBOmjKhnLUH23JOy5uLB =LyQQ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
