On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 6:13 PM, Stefan Schmidt <[email protected]> wrote: > Hello. > > On Thu, 2009-01-08 at 17:32, Nelson Castillo wrote: >> >> I fail to see your point :-( > > From my view the main point Holger is making is that you did the work in a > nice > generic way but kept it all in the openmoko-only git tree. Speculating if > upstream likes this or not could get clarified by actually sending it there as > RFC and aks them.
Good :-) I'll do it. You know? The "framework" is not really important IMHO. I think we've spent most of the time working on algorithms and not in the framework which is quite simple anyway. If upstream does not like the patches we might then decide to port them to tslib. I think they belong to kernel space but they might as well live in userspace with some workarounds that I do not like (we will have to leave one filter in kernel space in the same driver code... and check some other weird things, but it might work). I sent a patch to tslib and I got zero feedback. It is not a really active project. It will be quite fun if our patch doesn't end up in upstream kernel but in the OE repository as a patch to tslib 1.0 :-) If that happens I'll ask Holger for free pizza! The TS is working and it is what matters. I'll send email upstream today or tomorrow and I hope we get to know what they think soon. _______________________________________________ devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
