Yes, but this behaviour is not relevant - the scheme takes into account the result of the Cancelling (487 reply), but not what the client should do when processing the CANCEL.
Regards, Bogdan Klaus Darilion wrote: > > > Bogdan-Andrei Iancu schrieb: >> Klaus Darilion wrote: >>> Maxim Sobolev schrieb: >>>> According to my reading yes, UAC should wait either arrival of the >>>> first provisional response or expiration of Timer B (doing due >>>> retransmits in the meantime for unreliable transports) and send >>>> CANCEL if provisional reply comes in. >>>> >>> >>> Yes. From figure 5 it looks like retransmissions should not be >>> stopped, but figures are usually not normative. >>> >> As mentioned before, IMHO , figure 5 does not contain at all the case >> of a CANCEL generated by the UAC. So I guess it does not provide any >> useful info for our case. > > I think it is included implicitly (by receiving a 487 from the UAS). > > regards > klaus > > _______________________________________________ Devel mailing list Devel@lists.openser.org http://lists.openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devel
