I noticed there is a new dialog callback type: DLGCB_WITHIN_RESPONSE. I think that for having a consistent naming scheme, it should be called DLGCB_RESPONSE_WITHIN, considering that we already had DLGCB_REQ_WITHIN and DLGCB_RESPONSE_FWDED.
Also, I think the use of abbreviations should be consistent as well (REQ vs RESPONSE). I don't care for one or another, but I see no reason to use abbreviations only in one case, considering that the words request and response have about the same length. These inconsistencies only make for confusing interfaces. -- Dan _______________________________________________ Devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devel
