Inaki, Should the dialog timeout in this case?
Adrian On Jul 7, 2009, at 3:46 PM, Iñaki Baz Castillo wrote: > 2009/7/7 Klaus Darilion <klaus.mailingli...@pernau.at>: >>> PUBLISH "dialog" with "trying" state is in fact a NOOP and it's not >>> useful at all from the watcher's perspective. I suggest never to >>> publish it. >>> >>> Also, the "proceeding" state means that a 1xx with no To tag (this >>> is, >>> a 100) has been received. This is also not useful, so I wouldn't >>> publish it. >> >> IMO it is useful - eg. A calls PSTN and the call setup takes long - >> e.g. 10 >> seconds until "ringing". In this time intervall, A is already busy >> on the >> phone, thus other probably will get notified that A is currently on >> the >> phone and the will try to reach him later. > > Othe example: > > - A is subscribed to dialog presence of C. > - B calls C. > - The proxy generates a dialog "trying" PUBLISH (C is called) and > sends it to A. > - A sees in his phone that C is begin called by B. > - However, due to some network error (or C crashed) C doesn't reply to > the INVITE (neither 100 or 1XX). > > In this case, why is useful the NOTIFY A has received? > Or perhaps the "trying" and "preceeding" NOTIFY would only be received > by A in case C is the caller? > > > > -- > Iñaki Baz Castillo > <i...@aliax.net> > > _______________________________________________ > Devel mailing list > Devel@lists.opensips.org > http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devel _______________________________________________ Devel mailing list Devel@lists.opensips.org http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devel