On Feb 18, 2013, at 5:52 PM, Peter Lemenkov wrote: > 2013/2/18 Saúl Ibarra Corretgé <s...@ag-projects.com>: > >>> What things need to be sorted out when moving to GIT: >>> >> >> First question: would it be a self-hosted Git repository or the GitHub >> service? > > "Why can't we have both?" > > I personally don't see any issues here - It's possible to setup a > "primary" repo at SF and "secondary" at GitHub. To be honest I'd > prefer GitHub. >
Sure, having more than one is actually good, just in case any of the services goes down. > Also I'd like to propose a switch to a new issue tracker at SF.net. > Just compare that one we have to use now with the newest one: > > * http://sourceforge.net/p/sipp/bugs/ > * http://sourceforge.net/p/curl/bugs/ > Does the new tracker have anything like the pull requests mechanism? -- Saúl Ibarra Corretgé AG Projects _______________________________________________ Devel mailing list Devel@lists.opensips.org http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devel
