Hey @bogdan-iancu, thanks for chiming in :-)
> that may simplify your patch a lot - the nat_helper timer routing is
> registered with "TIMER_FLAG_DELAY_ON_DELAY" - this guarantees that (even
> executed in various processes) the handler will not be run in parallel (all
> its executions will be serial). So you do not need locking at all. Also, the
> counter itself can shm allocated and its pointer can be passed to the timer
> handler (more elegant versus a global var).
This sounds like a better approach to me, can you adjust to it @aerringer?
Thanks a lot!
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/OpenSIPS/opensips/pull/751#issuecomment-171261698
_______________________________________________
Devel mailing list
Devel@lists.opensips.org
http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devel
