This is the output you ask:
Jan 18 17:54:32 proxysiptest /sbin/opensips[24766]: DBG:uri:e164_check: c=3
Jan 18 17:54:32 proxysiptest /sbin/opensips[24766]: DBG:uri:e164_check: c=9
Jan 18 17:54:32 proxysiptest /sbin/opensips[24766]: DBG:uri:e164_check: c=0
Jan 18 17:54:32 proxysiptest /sbin/opensips[24766]: DBG:uri:e164_check: c=2
Jan 18 17:54:32 proxysiptest /sbin/opensips[24766]: DBG:uri:e164_check: c=4
Jan 18 17:54:32 proxysiptest /sbin/opensips[24766]: DBG:uri:e164_check: c=9
Jan 18 17:54:32 proxysiptest /sbin/opensips[24766]: DBG:uri:e164_check: c=4
Jan 18 17:54:32 proxysiptest /sbin/opensips[24766]: DBG:uri:e164_check: c=5
Jan 18 17:54:32 proxysiptest /sbin/opensips[24766]: DBG:uri:e164_check: c=9
Jan 18 17:54:32 proxysiptest /sbin/opensips[24766]: DBG:uri:e164_check: c=3
Jan 18 17:54:32 proxysiptest /sbin/opensips[24766]: DBG:uri:e164_check: c=1
Jan 18 17:54:32 proxysiptest /sbin/opensips[24766]: DBG:uri:e164_check: c=0
Jan 18 17:54:32 proxysiptest /sbin/opensips[24766]: DBG:uri:e164_check: c=@
You're right. I copied (c < '0' && c > '9') from the 1.11.5 branch ( It's the
only difference between the checks.c files) without thinking .
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/OpenSIPS/opensips/issues/762#issuecomment-172590284
_______________________________________________
Devel mailing list
Devel@lists.opensips.org
http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devel
