'protected' ? ;-) I mean when a 'derived' component creted, altering/extending original vehaviour, they canbe used.
But just guessing... Zoltán christopher.l...@thurweb.ch írta ekkor: 2013.11.24. 10:26 Andrey I beg to differ. You can hack in any language, just as you can apply clean coding conventions. QML is no different here, it is just a little less rigorous in enforcing some conventions. Just like any code, QML code will need maintaining, updating etc, so I prefer to clean code and follow the conventions where they make sense. http://harmattan-dev.nokia.com/docs/library/html/qt4/qml-coding-conventions.html clearly states that double underscore are private, not for external use. So it's hands off double underscores, but this raises the moot point: what about single underscores like _contentColumn? By a strict reading of the conventions they are not private, so what does a single underscore imply? Chris Zitat von "Andrey Kozhevnikov" <coderusin...@gmail.com>: > Please check ContextMenu and ComboBox code. > _contentColumn property used in a proper way. > > QML is not C++ where you not allowed to reimplement headers to use > private and protected functions outside. QML is hack-for-fun. > > On 24.11.2013 00:03, coderusin...@gmail.com wrote: >> We should not have to make that choice. >> >> using an underscore property is the pragmatic solution, but I would >> be interested to hear what the Jolla developers have to say on this >> issue. >> >> Zitat von "Andrey Kozhevnikov" <coderusin...@gmail.com>: >> >>> You should use it if you want "real" dynamically created components. >>> Or reimplement ContextMenu item. >>> >>> What would you prefer? >> >> >> > > _______________________________________________ SailfishOS.org Devel mailing list
_______________________________________________ SailfishOS.org Devel mailing list
