Current closed source might have other reasons rather than salary; - competitive advantage? - API completeness? etc main point should be discussion on clarification on how, if and when these closed sources will be made available.
On Wed, Dec 25, 2013 at 11:25 PM, a.gra...@gmail.com <a.gra...@gmail.com>wrote: > The two things are not related at all :) > > Even "Linux", that is 100% opensource, has hundred of people paid to > contribute to it full time. > > I know that the comparison is a bit unfair, but it's just to explain that > it can be normal to be paid to develop something that is opensource. > Can Jolla afford to rely completely on the community? They can't, at this > stage. They pay employees to develop some apps. This doesn't mean these > apps can't be opensourced for this reason. So probably there is a different > reason that only Jolla can explain. > > Cheers. > > > On 25 December 2013 22:17, Andrey Kozhevnikov <coderusin...@gmail.com>wrote: > >> I think there are persons in Jolla who receive a salary for developing >> >> because of that Jolla Core is not opensource (yet?) >> >> >> On 26.12.2013 03:05, Vincent B. wrote: >> >>> I'm not sure about it, since I'm unable to find the sources for Jolla >>> core apps such as the app clock. I'd like to add the ability to select a >>> timer's duration at the second precision level. >>> >>> Thanks in advance, >>> >>> Vincent >>> _______________________________________________ >>> SailfishOS.org Devel mailing list >>> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> SailfishOS.org Devel mailing list >> > > > > -- > Andrea Grandi - Software Engineer / Qt Ambassador / Nokia Developer > Champion > website: http://www.andreagrandi.it > > _______________________________________________ > SailfishOS.org Devel mailing list >
_______________________________________________ SailfishOS.org Devel mailing list
