+1 to this; I had the same issue. It's confusing if you have to reinstall from scratch for instance.
On Thu, Jul 25, 2019 at 7:44 PM E.S. Rosenberg < es.rosenberg+sailfishos....@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi all, > TL;DR - if we're doing version numbers for the SDK can they at least be > the same as the SFOS to which they correspond? > > I assume this may have come up already in the past but I still want to ask > this again. > I noticed when recently redownloading the SDK that the versioning scheme > had switched twice from numbers to dates and then back to numbers. > > As a rule I am a proponent of the dates versioning system since it allows > me the user to easily know just how far behind I am. > That being said in this case I am actually a proponent of version numbers > with the caveat that the SDK version and the SFOS version number should be > the same. > When I was downloading the SDK I actually ended up cancelling the download > and double checking the file listsing to see whether I was indeed > downloading the most recent version because 2.x was also a SFOS version > once upon a time. > Regards, > Eli > > _______________________________________________ > SailfishOS.org Devel mailing list > To unsubscribe, please send a mail to > devel-unsubscr...@lists.sailfishos.org
_______________________________________________ SailfishOS.org Devel mailing list To unsubscribe, please send a mail to devel-unsubscr...@lists.sailfishos.org
